Skip to main content

Security report for mgo-fachverlage.de

mgo fachverlage · Education · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

mgo fachverlage is a specialized German publishing company focusing on Fachbücher (specialized books), Fachzeitschriften (journals), Arbeitsmaterialien (work materials), and digital formats. The website positions itself as a niche player in the education and professional publishing sector, targeting professionals and academics. The business model revolves around content creation and distribution in specialized fields, with a clear focus on German-speaking markets. The website uses WordPress with the Avada theme and integrates advanced tools such as Slider Revolution for content presentation and multiple analytics platforms including self-hosted Matomo and Google Analytics, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent managed by Usercentrics, but lacks visible security headers and explicit security policies. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could improve transparency around privacy policies and incident response. The risk level is low with no detected vulnerabilities or suspicious content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mgo-fachverlage.de

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the education sector as a specialist publisher, providing tailored content for professional audiences. Its competitive advantage lies in its niche focus and diversified content formats including print and digital. The business model likely includes direct sales and subscriptions. The website's use of advanced analytics and consent management tools suggests a focus on compliance and data-driven marketing. No explicit partnerships or subsidiaries were identified. The company appears small but professional, with consistent branding and good content quality. Growth indicators are not visible from the data, but the digital maturity suggests readiness for expansion or enhanced customer engagement.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism, which are positive security and privacy indicators. The use of self-hosted Matomo analytics reduces reliance on third-party trackers, enhancing privacy. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, which is a gap in transparency and readiness. The use of an outdated jQuery version (1.11.3) could pose security risks if not patched. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in headers, policies, and software updates.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  2. Update jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish clear privacy policy and terms of service documents accessible from the homepage to improve compliance and user trust.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy and contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails) to enhance transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and monitor website security posture and update cookie consent mechanisms as regulations evolve.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
mgo fachverlage
Description
Fachverlag spezialisiert auf die Veröffentlichung von Fachbüchern, Fachzeitschriften, Arbeitsmaterialien und digitalen Formaten.
Key services
Publishing Fachbücher (specialized books), Fachzeitschriften (specialized journals), Arbeitsmaterialien (work materials), Digitale Formate (digital formats)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.3, Slider Revolution 6.1.8, Matomo Analytics, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Usercentrics CMP
Frameworks
WordPress, Avada Theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Self-hosted Matomo for privacy-friendly analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Tracking pixels
Matomo, ID5 Sync
Marketing tools
Usercentrics CMP
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional German specialist publisher site.
  2. Uses WordPress with Avada theme and Slider Revolution plugin.
  3. Implements GDPR-compliant cookie consent via Usercentrics.
  4. Uses multiple analytics tools including self-hosted Matomo and Google Analytics.
  5. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage HTML snapshot.
  6. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in the provided content.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Avada theme, a popular and feature-rich CMS platform. It uses Slider Revolution for dynamic content display and integrates multiple analytics tools including Matomo and Google Analytics. The site loads jQuery 1.11.3, which is outdated and should be updated. Performance is moderate, with caching and optimization partially implemented (e.g., autoptimize CSS). Mobile optimization is good, and SEO meta tags are present but could be enhanced with structured data. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mgo-fachverlage.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mgo-fachverlage.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.