Skip to main content

Security report for metrics.hu

Technology · N/a

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 4 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website web.metrics.hu serves as a login portal for the Open Web Analytics platform, a technology solution focused on web analytics data collection and reporting. The site targets users such as website administrators and analysts who utilize the Open Web Analytics software. The business model revolves around providing analytics services through a software platform, with a focus on technology industry users. The website content is minimal, primarily facilitating user authentication to access analytics data. From a technical perspective, the site uses PHP and JavaScript technologies and is built on the Open Web Analytics framework. The site is served over HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the technical implementation is basic with limited SEO optimization, accessibility, and mobile responsiveness. The login form collects username and password data but lacks visible advanced security measures such as CSRF tokens or security headers. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and password fields properly masked. However, the absence of security headers and lack of visible incident response or security policies reduce the overall security maturity. No privacy or cookie policies are present on the login page, indicating limited privacy compliance. WHOIS data is consistent and supports the legitimacy of the domain and business. Overall, the website is functional for its purpose but lacks comprehensive privacy, security, and business information disclosures. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, adding privacy and cookie policies, enhancing form security, and providing clear contact and incident response information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching metrics.hu

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the technology sector, providing web analytics software services under the Open Web Analytics brand. The market positioning is that of a niche analytics platform alternative to larger analytics providers. The business model is software-as-a-service (SaaS) oriented, targeting website owners and analysts. Revenue streams likely include software licensing or hosting fees. The target customer segment is technical users requiring web analytics capabilities. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the provided data. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not disclosed on the login page. The business maintains consistent branding aligned with Open Web Analytics but provides minimal public-facing business information.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and password inputs are secured by masking. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a notable gap. The login form lacks CSRF tokens, which could expose the site to cross-site request forgery attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are visible, limiting transparency. Data protection practices and GDPR compliance indicators are absent on this page. Overall, the security culture appears basic with room for improvement in formalizing security controls and policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add CSRF tokens to all forms to prevent cross-site request forgery vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish privacy and cookie policies to improve transparency and GDPR compliance.
  4. Provide clear contact information and incident response channels to build trust and facilitate security reporting.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility to improve user experience and broaden accessibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website is a login portal for Open Web Analytics, a web analytics platform.
Key services
Web analytics data collection and reporting
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, PHP
Frameworks
Open Web Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Password input fields use type password
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Open Web Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a login portal for Open Web Analytics platform.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the login page.
  3. No contact information or security policies disclosed on this page.
  4. Uses HTTPS and includes JavaScript for analytics reporting.
  5. No external advertising or tracking networks detected.
  6. Minimal content focused on user login functionality.
  7. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
  8. WHOIS data consistent and domain appears legitimate.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses PHP and JavaScript technologies within the Open Web Analytics framework. The site is served over HTTPS, indicating a secure transport layer. The login page includes JavaScript for analytics reporting but lacks modern SEO meta tags and accessibility features. Performance appears moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading. The site does not use a known CMS. There is no evidence of third-party hosting providers or CDNs from the HTML content. Technical debt is indicated by missing security headers and minimal privacy compliance features. Modernization opportunities include improving SEO, accessibility, and security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with metrics.hu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review metrics.hu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.