Skip to main content

Security report for meom.fi

MEOM · Technology · Finland

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MEOM Oy is a Finnish technology company specializing in B2B website development and digital strategy services, primarily using WordPress and HubSpot platforms. The company positions itself as a premium partner with a strong focus on maximizing business impact through strategic web solutions, boasting a high customer satisfaction score (NPS 93). Their market presence is supported by comprehensive service offerings including website development, strategy, and ongoing support, targeting B2B clients in Finland. Technically, the website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with integrations such as Cookiebot for consent management, Google Tag Manager, and Matomo for analytics, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and SEO, with strong accessibility features. Security posture is robust with HTTPS enforced, appropriate security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear cookie policies and GDPR adherence. Overall, the website and business demonstrate high professionalism and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing Permissions-Policy header

      Controls browser features and APIs

      What to do: Implement a Permissions-Policy to restrict feature access

      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Permissions-Policy: accelerometer=(), autoplay=(), camera=(), cross-origin-isolated=(),…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

      Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

      What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      DMARC not enforcing

      DMARC policy is set to "none"

      What to do: Gradually move to "quarantine" then "reject" policy

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Medium

      SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

      SSL certificate expires in 39 days

      What to do: Plan SSL certificate renewal

Keep watching meom.fi

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
80
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention meom.fi, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for meom.fi right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MEOM operates in the technology sector focusing on B2B digital services. Their competitive advantage lies in combining strategic insight with technical execution, delivering measurable ROI improvements for clients. The business model revolves around service contracts for website creation, strategy consulting, and maintenance. Their client base includes notable Finnish companies, supported by visible testimonials and references. The company has been established since 2014, indicating stability and experience. Partnerships with platforms like HubSpot and use of analytics tools like Hotjar and Matomo suggest a data-driven approach. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, indicating an independent operation. The company maintains a consistent brand image and high-quality content, reinforcing market credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, including HSTS and Content Security Policy. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot with blocking mode enabled, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations. No security policy or incident response pages were found, representing an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content or scripts. The use of reputable third-party services like HubSpot, Google, and Hotjar is balanced with privacy considerations. Overall, the security maturity is high, but publishing explicit security and incident response policies would enhance transparency and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and controls.
  2. Add incident response contact information or a dedicated security contact email.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet or exceed WCAG standards for broader inclusivity.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
MEOM Oy
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MEOM
Description
Maksimoi sivustosi liiketoimintavaikutus: > 30 % paremmat konversiot ja vähintään 2x ROI. Suomen tyytyväisimmät asiakkaat: NPS +93.
Key services
WordPress website development, HubSpot website development, Digital strategy, Ongoing website maintenance and support
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, HubSpot, Yoast SEO, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Matomo Tag Manager, Hotjar
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS, HubSpot CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with blocking mode
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Matomo, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, HubSpot tracking, Hotjar, Matomo
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Hotjar, Matomo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with Cookiebot
  3. Strong focus on B2B web development and digital strategy services
  4. Multiple customer references and testimonials present
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  6. Clear contact information and physical addresses provided
  7. No visible security or privacy red flags
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with custom themes and plugins, including Yoast SEO for search optimization and Cookiebot for cookie management. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Matomo for analytics, indicating a sophisticated tracking setup. The site loads quickly and is optimized for mobile devices, with responsive design and accessibility considerations. The use of modern web fonts and SVG logos contributes to a polished user experience. Hosting details are not explicitly disclosed, but the presence of Cloudflare CDN or similar services was not detected. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting the business goals effectively with minimal technical debt.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with meom.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review meom.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.