Skip to main content

Security report for meetnlearn.si

meetnlearn s.r.o. · Education · Slovenia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

meetnlearn.si is an educational platform based in Slovenia that connects students with tutors for individual learning sessions across various subjects such as mathematics, languages, and sciences. Founded in 2019, the company operates a user-friendly website offering features like tutor search, question and answer forums, and blog content to support learning. The platform targets students, tutors, and families, including those from abroad, positioning itself as a trusted regional player with partnerships including Wayra, the European Union, and Telefónica. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including React and Bootstrap, hosted on Websupport infrastructure, and integrates analytics and social media SDKs for marketing and user engagement. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, provides a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, and maintains GDPR compliance, although it lacks explicit security policies or incident response contacts. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and privacy-conscious, with room for improvement in security header implementation and incident response transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching meetnlearn.si

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
80
DNS health
55
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business model revolves around a marketplace platform facilitating connections between tutors and learners, monetizing likely through subscriptions or commissions. The company leverages trust signals such as verified profiles, user reviews, and partnerships to maintain competitive advantage. Its multilingual support and presence in multiple countries indicate growth ambitions. The platform's content strategy includes blogs and Q&A sections to engage users and improve SEO. Payment options are diverse, supporting various popular methods. The absence of direct contact details on the homepage suggests a focus on digital self-service. Strategic partnerships with notable organizations enhance credibility and potential funding avenues.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent aligned with GDPR, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, it lacks published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are important for transparency and trust. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Facebook SDK introduces potential risks that require ongoing monitoring. Security headers are not explicitly detected, representing an area for enhancement. Overall, the site is secure for users but could improve its security culture and communication.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide clear incident response contact information.
  3. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
meetnlearn s.r.o.
Description
Platforma za iskanje inštruktorjev in individualne učne ure iz različnih predmetov, kot so matematika, angleščina, nemščina itd.
Key services
Iskanje inštruktorjev, Dodajanje povpraševanj po inštrukcijah, Online in osebne učne ure, Učna vprašanja in odgovori, Blog inštruktorjev
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, React (implied by react components), Google Fonts, Iconify icons, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, Ably Websockets
Frameworks
Bootstrap, React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism with granular options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure external scripts with crossorigin attributes

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features.
  2. Strong focus on user privacy with explicit cookie consent and GDPR compliance.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed on the homepage or footer.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  5. Presence of partner logos and trust signals.
  6. No visible security policy or incident response contacts.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found.
  8. Good multilingual support with language switcher.
  9. Payment methods displayed include Google Pay, PayPal, Visa, Mastercard, Maestro, Discover.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with React components and Bootstrap for responsive design, ensuring good mobile optimization and user experience. Hosting is provided by Websupport, a known provider in the region. Performance is moderate with preloading of stylesheets and asynchronous loading of scripts. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph data, and canonical links. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The site integrates multiple external services for analytics and social media, which are managed with user consent. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or headless architecture. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals effectively with some opportunities for optimization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with meetnlearn.si. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review meetnlearn.si.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.