Skip to main content

Security report for mediabox.lv

Saimnieciskās darbības veicējs Rolands Umbrovskis · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MediaBox.lv is a small Latvian business specializing in website and application development services primarily serving the Kuldīga and Riga regions. The company presents itself as an experienced local service provider, established since 2001, with verifiable business registration and tax numbers. The website content is professional but basic, focusing on service description without extensive marketing or trust-building elements. Technically, the site uses modern analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and Matomo, and it is served over HTTPS, indicating a baseline of digital maturity. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and explicit contact information limits its compliance and trustworthiness from a security and privacy perspective. Overall, the site is functional and moderately optimized but lacks advanced security and privacy features expected in contemporary web services.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mediabox.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mediabox.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for mediabox.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the technology sector, specifically in web and application development, targeting local Latvian clients. Its business model is service-oriented, likely relying on project-based revenue streams. The presence of a partner domain (simplemediacode.com) suggests some ecosystem collaboration. The company’s market position appears regional and small-scale, with limited digital marketing sophistication. The lack of social media presence and minimal content depth indicate opportunities for growth in brand visibility and customer engagement. The business credibility is supported by official registration data but could be enhanced by more transparent contact and compliance information.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and use of reputable analytics platforms. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a notable gap. No forms or user input fields reduce attack surface but also limit user interaction. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR best practices, which is critical given the EU jurisdiction. Incident response and security policies are not published, suggesting limited formal security governance. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with room for significant improvement to meet industry standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add standard security headers to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Provide clear and verified contact information including company emails and phone numbers.
  4. Consider adding a security policy and incident response contact to build trust and readiness.
  5. Improve mobile optimization and accessibility to enhance user experience and SEO.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Saimnieciskās darbības veicējs Rolands Umbrovskis
Registration number
AD0005475
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Saimnieciskās darbības veicējs Rolands Umbrovskis
Description
Mājas lapu un aplikāciju izstrāde Kuldīgā un Rīgā
Key services
website development, application development
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Matomo Analytics, Open Sans font, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Matomo for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided
  4. Business information is limited but includes registration and tax numbers
  5. Use of modern analytics tools but no explicit privacy compliance
  6. No forms or user input fields detected
  7. No security headers detected in provided data
  8. Content is professional and focused on web/app development services
  9. External links limited and mostly to trusted domains
  10. No suspicious or malicious indicators found
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technology stack with Google Tag Manager and Matomo for analytics, and Open Sans font from Google Fonts. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected, suggesting a custom or static site. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. The site is mobile responsive at a basic level but lacks advanced accessibility features. SEO optimization is minimal with basic meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the provided data. The technical implementation is adequate for a small business but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mediabox.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mediabox.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.