Skip to main content

Security report for mbbrowser.com

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mbbrowser is a software tool provider specializing in anti-detection browser technology aimed at cross-border e-commerce users. The website presents itself as a provider of fingerprint modification tools and anti-association browsers that replace traditional multi-opening software solutions. The business model appears to focus on software sales or licensing for e-commerce professionals needing anonymity or multi-account management. The site uses modern web technologies including Vue.js and Ant Design, with embedded third-party chat and analytics services. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no contact information is provided, which impacts trust and compliance perceptions. Security posture is weak due to lack of visible security headers and unknown SSL configuration. Overall, the site is functional and professionally designed but lacks critical trust and compliance elements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mbbrowser.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
69
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets a niche market of cross-border e-commerce operators requiring anti-detection browser tools. Its competitive advantage lies in offering a software alternative to VPS, virtual machines, and simulators for multi-account management. The business ecosystem includes third-party analytics and chat support but lacks visible partnerships or certifications. Revenue streams likely come from software licensing or subscriptions. The absence of clear business registration and contact details limits confidence in the company's operational transparency. Growth indicators and market positioning are unclear due to limited public business information.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS assumed but not confirmed from the data. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected. The use of third-party scripts introduces potential vulnerabilities if not properly managed. No incident response or security policy information is available, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates poor compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the security maturity is low, exposing the business to risks related to trust, data protection, and potential exploitation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publicly disclose a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Register the domain properly and ensure WHOIS data is available or justified if privacy protection is used.
  3. Add security headers and verify SSL/TLS configuration to strengthen security posture.
  4. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility.
  5. Develop and publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to demonstrate security readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Mbbrowser is an anti Association Super tool software in the field of cross-border e-commerce, which perfectly replaces the traditional small size multi opening software such as VPS system, virtual machine, simulator, cloud mobile phone and one click new machine
Key services
Anti Association Super tool software, Fingerprint Browser, Super Browser, Anti Association Browser, Cross-border E-commerce Browser
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Vue.js, Ant Design, Tawk.to chat widget, Baidu analytics, 51.la analytics
Frameworks
Vue.js, Ant Design
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Baidu Analytics, 51.la
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Baidu Analytics, 51.la
Marketing tools
Tawk.to
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no WAF blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, indicating potential domain registration or privacy issues.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found on the site.
  5. Site uses third-party analytics and chat services from Baidu, 51.la, and Tawk.to.
  6. Site content is focused on anti-detection browser software for e-commerce.
  7. No explicit or adult content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
  8. Security headers and SSL configuration details are not available from provided data.
  9. No security or incident response policies or contacts found.
  10. Site design and technical implementation are modern and use Vue.js and Ant Design.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks such as Vue.js and styled with Ant Design components, indicating a contemporary front-end architecture. It integrates third-party services like Tawk.to for live chat and Baidu and 51.la for analytics, which suggests a focus on user engagement and traffic monitoring. Performance appears moderate with preloaded scripts and responsive design elements. However, the lack of CMS or hosting provider information limits insight into backend infrastructure. Accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic but present. Technical debt is not evident but could arise from reliance on external scripts without clear security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mbbrowser.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mbbrowser.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.