Skip to main content

Security report for maxy.top

Technology · Iceland

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website maxy.top is a personal portfolio site for the developer known as 'maxeepy'. It primarily showcases open source projects hosted on platforms such as GitHub and Codeberg, and provides links to various social media profiles. The site is relatively new, with the domain registered in late 2023, and targets a general audience interested in technology and software development. The business model is personal branding and project showcasing rather than commercial services. The site is small in scale and focused on individual presence in the technology sector. Technically, the site is built using Python and the Flask framework, hosted by Spaceship, Inc. The HTML content is basic but functional, with moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. SEO and accessibility features are minimal but present. No CMS or advanced platforms are detected. The site does not use analytics or tracking services, indicating a privacy-conscious approach. From a security perspective, the site lacks advanced security headers and does not enable DNSSEC on the domain. There is no visible privacy or cookie policy, and no contact information is provided for incident response or data protection officers. The domain uses privacy protection for WHOIS data, which is justified given the personal nature of the site. No vulnerabilities or malicious content were detected, but security posture is basic and could be improved. Overall, the site is low risk with a moderate trust level. Strategic recommendations include adding privacy and cookie policies, implementing security headers, improving mobile and accessibility features, and providing contact information for better compliance and trust. The site serves well as a personal portfolio but lacks professional security and compliance maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching maxy.top

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
40
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

maxy.top operates as a personal developer portfolio focusing on open source projects and social media presence. Its market positioning is niche, targeting technology enthusiasts and potential collaborators. The business model is non-commercial, centered on personal branding and project sharing. Revenue streams are not evident, suggesting a hobbyist or community contribution approach. The target customer segment includes developers and open source users. Growth indicators are limited due to the site's recent creation and basic content. The partnership ecosystem includes links to popular code hosting platforms and social networks but no formal partnerships. Strategic observations highlight the need for improved compliance and security to enhance credibility.

Security posture

The security maturity of maxy.top is basic. The site uses HTTPS (implied by domain and hosting provider but not explicitly stated), but lacks DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and similar regulations. Incident response readiness is not demonstrated due to absence of security contact information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found, but the lack of security best practices reduces the overall security posture. The site would benefit from implementing standard security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing privacy and cookie policies to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and improve user trust.
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security and incident response contacts.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility to improve user experience and SEO.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
@maxeepy personal site
Key services
open source projects hosting, personal site and portfolio, social media and project links
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Python, Flask
Frameworks
Flask
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal portfolio site for developer 'maxeepy'.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers provided.
  4. Site uses Python Flask backend and is hosted by Spaceship, Inc.
  5. No security headers or advanced security measures detected.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. Content is basic but functional with clear project and social links.
  8. No adult or questionable content present.
  9. WHOIS data shows privacy protection and recent domain registration.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a Python Flask backend, hosted by Spaceship, Inc. The HTML structure is valid and includes basic meta tags and Open Graph tags for social sharing. The site uses static assets for images and CSS. Performance is moderate with no heavy scripts or analytics detected, which benefits load times. Mobile optimization is basic, with no advanced responsive design features observed. Accessibility is minimal but present through alt attributes on images. SEO is basic with meta descriptions and titles but lacks structured data such as JSON-LD. The site does not use a CMS, indicating a custom or lightweight static/dynamic site. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and security headers, which could be addressed to improve security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with maxy.top. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review maxy.top.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.