Skip to main content

Security report for matrix42.com

Matrix42 · Technology · Germany

High risk. 16 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Matrix42 is a European enterprise software company specializing in IT service management, software asset management, endpoint security, and identity governance solutions. The company positions itself as a leader in European service management, offering AI-powered and cloud-flexible platforms tailored to enterprise needs. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, comprehensive content, and a focus on compliance and customer engagement through events and partnerships. Technically, the site leverages HubSpot CMS, modern JavaScript libraries, and integrates marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and security headers, though explicit security policies and incident response details are not publicly disclosed. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable anomaly but does not detract significantly from the overall legitimacy given the professional branding and content. Strategic recommendations include publishing detailed security policies, adding vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, and improving transparency on certifications and incident contacts.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

16 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: Telnet

      Port 23 (Telnet) is publicly accessible - Telnet - Unencrypted remote access

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to Telnet using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: SMB

      Port 445 (SMB) is publicly accessible - SMB - Windows file sharing, high risk

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to SMB using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MSSQL

      Port 1433 (MSSQL) is publicly accessible - MSSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MSSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: Oracle

      Port 1521 (Oracle) is publicly accessible - Oracle - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to Oracle using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching matrix42.com

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
85
Average
63
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention matrix42.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
120
Employees
6
Customers
88
Third parties
26
Weak passwords
3%

Latest record dated 2026-05-28 · 12 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for matrix42.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –accounts.matrix42.com2026-05-28
  • –info.matrix42.com2025-09-24
  • –info.matrix42.com2025-09-19
  • –myworkspace-api.matrix42.com2025-08-01
  • –info.matrix42.com2025-07-13

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Matrix42 operates in the technology sector, targeting medium to large enterprises seeking comprehensive IT service and asset management solutions. Their business model is B2B SaaS and software licensing, supported by professional services and training. The company emphasizes European values and compliance, which is a competitive advantage in regulated markets. Partnerships, such as with Raynet, enhance their market reach and solution portfolio. The website content and event promotions indicate active market engagement and growth orientation. Revenue streams likely include software licenses, subscriptions, consulting, and training services. The absence of direct contact emails suggests a controlled lead generation approach via forms. Overall, Matrix42 demonstrates a strong market position with a clear value proposition and a well-established partner ecosystem.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and implements key security headers, indicating a good baseline security posture. Cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies align with GDPR requirements, reflecting compliance awareness. However, the lack of publicly available security policies, incident response plans, or vulnerability disclosure channels limits transparency and may impact trust among security-conscious clients. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the site content or scripts. The use of third-party marketing and analytics scripts introduces typical risks but appears managed. Enhancing security documentation and providing direct security contacts would improve the security maturity perception and readiness for incident handling.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to increase transparency and trust.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Provide direct security contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and integrations for security and privacy compliance.
  5. Enhance business credibility by listing certifications and compliance attestations prominently on the website.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Matrix42
Description
Matrix42 provides flexible IT platforms and solutions to drive efficiency, including AI-powered service management, software asset management, IT asset management, endpoint data protection, unified endpoint management, and identity governance.
Key services
Service Management, Software Asset Management, IT Asset Management, Endpoint Data Protection, Unified Endpoint Management, Identity Governance and Administration, Remote Maintenance (FastViewer), AI-powered Service Desk Intelligence
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HubSpot CMS, JavaScript, Swiper.js, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Platforms
HubSpot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • Secure forms with HubSpot integration

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
HubSpot Marketing
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and rich content.
  2. Strong focus on European IT service management solutions.
  3. Comprehensive cookie and privacy policy with consent mechanism.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed; contact via form.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies found on site.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and marketing analytics tools.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  8. WHOIS data missing, which reduces trust but site content suggests legitimacy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the HubSpot CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js for interactive elements and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing integrations. The site is mobile responsive with good accessibility features and SEO optimization. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by rich media content and third-party scripts. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence suitable for enterprise clients. Opportunities exist to optimize loading times and reduce third-party script dependencies to improve performance and security posture further. The absence of hosting provider details limits full infrastructure assessment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with matrix42.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review matrix42.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.