Skip to main content

Security report for matchmyemail.com

RAE Internet Inc. · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Match My Email, operated by RAE Internet Inc., is a specialized technology company providing email matching services that integrate emails with CRM systems to enhance sales and customer relationship management. The company targets business users, particularly sales teams and CRM users, offering a SaaS subscription model with integrations such as Salesforce and Google Apps. The website serves primarily as a login portal for existing users, with clear links to legal and privacy documentation, reflecting a professional and focused business approach. Technically, the website employs a custom-built platform using standard JavaScript libraries like jQuery and jQuery UI. The site demonstrates moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. While the infrastructure is stable, there is room for improvement in security configurations, such as enabling DNSSEC and implementing security headers. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms suggests partial privacy compliance, though privacy and terms policies are comprehensive and accessible. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and secure form submission methods but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which are recommended for enhanced protection. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, indicating open accessibility. The WHOIS data is consistent with the business identity, showing a long-standing domain registration with no privacy protection, which supports legitimacy. Overall, Match My Email presents a trustworthy and professional online presence with a solid business foundation. Strategic improvements in security headers, DNSSEC, and privacy compliance would enhance the security posture and user trust. The site’s content is safe for general audiences, with no adult or questionable material detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      SPF DNS Lookup Limit Exceeded

      SPF record requires 11 DNS lookups (max 10)

      What to do: Reduce includes and mechanisms to stay under limit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching matchmyemail.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
80
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Match My Email occupies a niche market in the technology sector, focusing on email-to-CRM integration services that streamline sales processes. Its competitive advantage lies in seamless integration with major platforms like Salesforce and Google Apps, catering to business users who require efficient email management linked to customer data. The SaaS subscription model provides recurring revenue streams, targeting small to medium-sized enterprises and sales teams. The company’s long domain registration and consistent branding indicate stable operations. However, limited public contact information and absence of social media presence may restrict broader market engagement. The partnership ecosystem appears limited based on available data, suggesting potential growth opportunities through strategic alliances and enhanced marketing efforts.

Security posture

The security maturity of Match My Email is moderate. The use of HTTPS and secure form handling are positive indicators, but the lack of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No explicit incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure policies were found, which could hinder rapid response to security events. Privacy policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, but the absence of cookie consent mechanisms indicates partial compliance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Enhancing security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing incident response contacts would significantly improve the security posture and compliance readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve user transparency.
  4. Publish explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure contact information to enhance trust and preparedness.
  5. Consider expanding public contact information and social media presence to improve business credibility and customer engagement.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RAE Internet Inc.
Description
Match My Email provides email matching services that automatically match emails to CRM records to improve sales and customer relationship management.
Key services
Email matching to CRM, Salesforce integration, Google Apps login integration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, jQuery UI 1.12.1, JavaScript, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • Form uses POST method
  • Login form includes CSRF hidden fields

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a login portal for Match My Email service.
  2. No WAF or security challenge detected.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the login page.
  4. Privacy and terms of service pages are linked and appear comprehensive.
  5. No cookie consent mechanism detected.
  6. No social media links found in the provided HTML.
  7. Site uses standard JavaScript libraries (jQuery) and custom scripts.
  8. No analytics or advertising scripts detected in the provided HTML.
  9. No explicit security headers visible in HTML content.
  10. Domain is stable and consistent with business identity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom platform utilizing jQuery and jQuery UI libraries, indicating a traditional but stable technology stack. The site uses POST methods for form submissions and includes CSRF protection fields, reflecting attention to secure input handling. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic, with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Hosting details are not explicit, but DNS is managed via DNSMadeEasy and domain registration via GoDaddy. There is no evidence of modern CMS usage or advanced frameworks. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack, improve mobile responsiveness, and enhance SEO and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with matchmyemail.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review matchmyemail.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.