Skip to main content

Security report for marmal.cz

MarMal.cz · Technology · Czech Republic

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MarMal.cz is a small Czech Republic-based web design and e-commerce service provider specializing in creating websites, e-shops, logos, and PPC advertising primarily for small businesses and sole proprietors. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings and client references, positioning itself as an affordable quality provider in its niche. Technically, the site uses basic JavaScript libraries including Google Analytics and a custom Greybox library, with moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. However, the site lacks modern security practices such as HTTPS enforcement and security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, which impacts its compliance posture. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness, although the visible contact information and business content appear legitimate. Overall, the site is functional and professional but requires improvements in security and privacy compliance to enhance trust and protect user data.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching marmal.cz

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention marmal.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for marmal.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets small local clients needing web presence and e-commerce solutions, leveraging a service model that includes hosting facilitation and ongoing website maintenance. Its competitive advantage lies in affordable pricing and personalized service. The company maintains a portfolio of client references indicating active operations. Revenue streams likely come from project-based web design, e-shop setups, and logo design services. The lack of social media presence and limited marketing tools suggests a focus on direct client relationships. Growth potential may be constrained by limited digital marketing and security posture. Partnerships include a recommended hosting provider (C4).

Security posture

The website demonstrates a low to moderate security maturity level. Key gaps include missing HTTPS enforcement, absence of security headers, and lack of privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance. The contact form uses JavaScript validation but lacks advanced protections such as CAPTCHA or CSRF tokens. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The use of Google Analytics without cookie consent mechanisms further exposes privacy compliance risks. These issues could lead to data exposure or regulatory penalties if unaddressed. The security culture appears minimal, with no visible certifications or policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with HSTS to secure all site traffic and protect user data.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance statements and consent mechanisms.
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  4. Enhance form security by adding CAPTCHA and CSRF protection to prevent abuse and injection attacks.
  5. Conduct a full security audit and establish an incident response plan including public contact channels for security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MarMal.cz
Description
MarMal.cz offers creation of websites, e-shops, logos, PPC advertising, and other web design services primarily targeting small businesses and sole proprietors.
Key services
web design, e-shop creation, logo design, PPC advertising, web hosting facilitation, website maintenance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Analytics, Greybox JS library
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • form validation via JavaScript

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and contact form.
  5. Site uses Google Analytics for tracking but lacks cookie consent mechanisms.
  6. Website content is in Czech language targeting local small businesses.
  7. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement visible in provided data.
  8. Site uses older JavaScript libraries and custom scripts.
  9. No social media links detected.
  10. Site branding and navigation are consistent and professional.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses traditional HTML with embedded JavaScript libraries including Google Analytics and Greybox for UI effects. No modern frameworks or CMS platforms are detected, indicating a custom-built site. Hosting is recommended via C4, but no direct hosting provider data is confirmed. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and SEO practices in place. The site lacks accessibility features and modern responsive design elements. Technical debt is evident in the use of older scripts and missing security best practices. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack, improve performance, and enhance security controls to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with marmal.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review marmal.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.