Skip to main content

Security report for marisakirisame.net

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website marisakirisame.net is a small personal or hobby site focused on technology-related content such as sourcemod, music, and graphical buttons. It does not represent a commercial business entity and serves a niche audience interested in these topics. The site is relatively new, founded in 2022, and uses Cloudflare DNS with domain registration through NameCheap. The technical infrastructure is basic, relying on standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without any detected CMS or frameworks. Mobile optimization and navigation are functional but minimal. Security posture is moderate with some positive indicators such as clientTransferProhibited domain status and Cloudflare DNS, but lacks advanced security headers and policies. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, which impacts compliance. Overall, the site is safe with no adult or explicit content detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching marisakirisame.net

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site operates as a personal project rather than a commercial business, targeting technology enthusiasts and hobbyists. It does not display typical business information such as company registration or physical addresses. The business model is non-commercial content sharing with no evident revenue streams or partnerships. The lack of certifications or trust indicators aligns with its personal nature. The site’s presence on social media platforms like Twitter and GitHub supports community engagement but does not indicate formal business operations.

Security posture

Security maturity is basic. The domain uses clientTransferProhibited status and Cloudflare DNS, which are positive trust signals. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, privacy policies, and incident response information indicates gaps in security best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The site does not appear to collect user data via forms or analytics, reducing risk but also limiting security controls. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a personal site but would require enhancements for commercial or sensitive data handling.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish privacy and cookie policies to improve transparency and compliance with data protection regulations.
  4. Add a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Consider HTTPS enforcement and regular security audits to maintain and improve security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Personal or hobby website featuring content related to 'sourcemod', music library, buttons, and a 'battle-of-wits' button. The site appears to be an individual or small-scale project rather than a commercial business.
Key services
sourcemod content, music library and now playing, 88x31 buttons, contact page for communication
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited set
  • Use of Cloudflare nameservers

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small personal/hobby site with limited content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact email is provided with domain-specific address.
  4. No phone numbers or physical addresses found.
  5. No security policies or incident response information published.
  6. No analytics or advertising scripts detected beyond a custom script.
  7. No CMS or major frameworks detected.
  8. Basic mobile responsiveness and navigation structure present.
  9. No adult or explicit content detected.
  10. WHOIS data shows domain is relatively new but consistent with site purpose.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technology stack with HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. It is hosted with DNS managed by Cloudflare and registered via NameCheap. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected, indicating low technical complexity. Performance is moderate with basic mobile responsiveness and navigation clarity. The site lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features but is functional for its purpose. There is no evidence of analytics or third-party marketing tools, which limits data collection but also reduces potential privacy concerns. Technical risks are low given the limited scope and content of the site.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with marisakirisame.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review marisakirisame.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.