Skip to main content

Security report for mantra.ms

Mantra · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mantra is a cybersecurity technology company specializing in phishing simulation and cybersecurity awareness training through an automated and gamified SaaS platform. The website positions Mantra as a key player in empowering corporate teams to defend against cyberattacks by focusing on the human element, which is the primary attack vector. The company recently announced an acquisition by Cyber Guru, indicating growth and market expansion. The technical infrastructure is modern, leveraging Webflow CMS and multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools, ensuring a responsive and user-friendly experience. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit privacy and cookie policies. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness, and no direct contact information or security incident channels are provided on the site, which could impact business credibility. Overall, the website is professional and content-rich but would benefit from enhanced transparency and compliance disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mantra.ms

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mantra operates in the cybersecurity training sector, targeting corporate clients concerned about phishing and human vulnerability to cyberattacks. Its business model is SaaS-based, offering subscription access to phishing simulation and awareness modules. The company leverages gamification to increase user engagement and effectiveness. Market positioning is strengthened by partnerships and acquisitions, such as with Cyber Guru. Revenue streams likely include tiered subscription plans and enterprise contracts. The website showcases reputable customer logos, enhancing credibility. However, the lack of detailed corporate information, contact data, and privacy policies suggests room for improvement in transparency and customer trust. The partnership ecosystem includes Cyber Guru, indicating strategic growth. The company appears to be small-sized with a focus on technology innovation in cybersecurity education.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. It uses modern tracking and marketing scripts but lacks explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No sensitive data or credentials are exposed in the HTML content. There is no evidence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure program, which are important for compliance and trust. The absence of a security.txt file or similar disclosure reduces transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a marketing website but could be improved by implementing recommended HTTP headers and publishing security-related policies and contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add explicit security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance web security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for sales, support, and security incidents.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mantra
Description
Mantra empowers your teams against hackers and boosts your cybersecurity with its automated and gamified phishing simulation tool and cybersecurity awareness module.
Key services
Phishing simulation, Cybersecurity awareness training, Gamified training modules
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Weglot (translation), Acquire (live chat), Clearbit (enrichment), Crisp Chat
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Clearbit
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Clearbit
Marketing tools
Acquire live chat, Weglot translation
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on main page
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML content
  5. Use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present
  7. Website targets corporate cybersecurity training market
  8. Parent company acquisition announced but no detailed corporate info provided
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS, utilizing a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Weglot for translations, Acquire live chat, Clearbit enrichment, and Crisp chat support. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation and SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate, likely due to multiple third-party scripts. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting is via Webflow's CDN, providing reliable uptime and SSL support. There is no evidence of server-side frameworks or backend technologies from the HTML content. The technical implementation is solid for a marketing and SaaS landing site but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mantra.ms. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mantra.ms.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.