Skip to main content

Security report for manaskatuve.lv

Education · Latvia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.manaskatuve.lv is a Latvian language platform focused on providing public speaking training and coaching services primarily for entrepreneurs, professionals, and personal brands. The business offers a variety of services including individual coaching, video courses, group training, and content creation support. The site is hosted on a modern CDN infrastructure (Cloudfront) and built using the Mozello website builder platform, leveraging common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Fancybox. The website is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and includes clear navigation and contact information, supporting a positive user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers are missing. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, but the website content and contact details indicate a legitimate small business operation. Privacy policy is present and GDPR compliance is indicated. Overall, the site demonstrates good digital maturity for a small coaching business with room for improvement in security headers and incident response transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching manaskatuve.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets a niche market of Latvian entrepreneurs and professionals seeking to improve their public speaking and communication skills. It leverages a service-based business model with revenue streams from individual coaching, online courses, and event-based training. The presence of social media channels and client testimonials supports credibility and market positioning. The business appears small but established with over 3700 participants in training projects over five years. The use of external scheduling and booking tools (TidyCal, Calendly) indicates integration with modern SaaS tools to streamline client engagement. The company emphasizes personalized coaching and practical communication techniques, differentiating itself in the local market.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a cookie consent banner, indicating awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, no advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No forms with sensitive data collection were found on the main page, reducing risk exposure. The use of third-party scripts (Facebook Pixel) introduces moderate tracking but is common for marketing purposes. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the analysis. Incident response and security policy information are absent, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and user rights in the privacy policy.
  5. Consider adding terms of service to clarify user agreements and legal protections.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Palīdzu jaunām un ambiciozām uzņēmējām caur publisko runu piesaistīt maksātgribošus klientus!
Key services
Publiskās runas treniņi individuāli un grupās, Video kurss prezentāciju veidošanā, Individuālais audits runas un komunikācijas pilnveidošanai, Vieslekcijas un treniņi pasākumos, Satura filmēšanas diena, Rokraksta analīze
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, Bannerplay jQuery plugin, ResponsiveVideos jQuery plugin, Mozello platform scripts
Platforms
Mozello website builder
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found

Analytics and tracking

Services
Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Cookie consent management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Latvian language targeting Latvian entrepreneurs and professionals.
  3. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; domain registration details unknown.
  4. Site uses HTTPS and Cloudfront CDN for hosting and delivery.
  5. Cookie consent banner is implemented in Latvian language.
  6. Social media presence is strong with Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and Telegram links.
  7. No explicit privacy or security policy pages beyond privacy policy found.
  8. No terms of service or incident response contacts found.
  9. No forms detected on the main page except mailto links and external booking links.
  10. No security headers detected in provided data; recommend adding them.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Mozello platform and uses a combination of jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, and other jQuery plugins for UI components and media handling. Hosting is via Amazon Cloudfront CDN, ensuring good content delivery performance. The site is mobile responsive with basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and canonical links. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. The technical stack is somewhat dated due to older jQuery version but remains functional. There is opportunity to modernize JavaScript libraries and improve accessibility compliance for a better user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with manaskatuve.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review manaskatuve.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.