Skip to main content

Security report for make.com

Make · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Make is a leading technology company specializing in no-code and low-code automation software that enables businesses to visually create, build, and scale workflows integrated with AI capabilities. Positioned as a leader in the automation software market, Make offers a robust platform with over 2,500 pre-built app integrations and enterprise-grade security features such as SOC 2 Type II and GDPR compliance. The company targets ambitious teams and enterprises seeking to accelerate innovation and operational efficiency through AI-powered automation. The website demonstrates a mature technical infrastructure built on modern web technologies including Next.js and RudderStack analytics, with strong SEO, accessibility, and mobile optimization. Security posture is robust with HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and privacy compliance mechanisms including cookie consent and detailed privacy policies. However, the absence of explicit vulnerability disclosure and incident response contacts suggests areas for improvement. Overall, Make exhibits a high level of digital maturity and business credibility, supported by strong branding, customer testimonials, and active community engagement. The lack of WHOIS data introduces some uncertainty in domain registration legitimacy, but the professional presentation and external trust signals mitigate this concern. Strategic recommendations include enhancing transparency around security incident response and vulnerability disclosure to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of make.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching make.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Make operates a SaaS business model focused on providing automation and AI orchestration tools to enterprises and business teams. Its competitive advantage lies in its extensive app integration library, visual no-code platform, and AI agent capabilities that adapt in real time. Revenue streams likely include subscription plans, enterprise licensing, and professional services. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem and community presence, which supports customer acquisition and retention. Growth indicators include a large customer base (350K+), numerous pre-built solutions, and active content marketing through blogs, webinars, and success stories. Make's market positioning as a leader in automation software is reinforced by certifications and positive customer reviews.

Security posture

Make demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and compliance with GDPR and SOC 2 Type II standards. The website includes cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies that align with regulatory requirements. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the website content. However, the absence of a public vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file and lack of incident response contact details represent gaps in transparency and readiness. Overall, the security maturity is high but could be improved by formalizing vulnerability management and incident response communications.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Enhance data retention policy disclosures to align with privacy best practices.
  4. Continue to monitor and update security headers and SSL configurations regularly.
  5. Maintain and expand community engagement to reinforce trust and brand loyalty.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Make
Description
Automate your work. Make allows you to visually create, build and automate workflows. User friendly no-code integration tool. Try it now for free!
Key services
Visual workflow automation, AI-powered automation, Enterprise-grade security and compliance, Pre-built app integrations (2500+ apps), Make Grid for automation landscape control
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (Next.js), RudderStack analytics, Cookielaw.org cookie consent, Video.js or HTML5 video player, Modern CSS modules
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
RudderStack
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
RudderStack
Marketing tools
RudderStack analytics, Cookie consent scripts
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking
  2. Strong focus on AI-powered automation and enterprise solutions
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  4. Multiple social media and community engagement channels
  5. No direct company phone numbers or emails found in HTML content
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  7. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed
  8. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including Next.js framework and React, ensuring fast performance and good SEO. Analytics are implemented via RudderStack, and cookie consent is managed through cookielaw.org scripts. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Video content is delivered via HTML5 video elements with multiple source formats for compatibility. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless CMS approach. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a high-quality user experience with minimal technical debt and good scalability potential.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 71/100 −1Medium27 findingsView report
  2. 72/100 −1Medium26 findingsView report
  3. 73/100Medium21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with make.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review make.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.