Skip to main content

Security report for make.com

Make · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Make is a leading AI-powered workflow automation platform designed to help businesses visually build, scale, and automate complex processes without code. Owned by Celonis, Inc., Make offers a comprehensive SaaS solution with over 2,500 pre-built applications and integrations, targeting enterprises seeking to accelerate innovation and operational efficiency through AI and agentic automation. The platform emphasizes real-time orchestration, scalability, and control, supported by strong compliance with GDPR and SOC 2 Type II standards. Technically, the website leverages modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, with integrated analytics and consent management tools, delivering a fast, mobile-optimized, and accessible user experience. Security posture is robust, with HTTPS enforcement, compliance certifications, and a bug bounty program, though some security headers could be improved. Overall, Make presents a professional, trustworthy, and mature digital presence aligned with its enterprise market positioning.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching make.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Make operates in the technology sector, focusing on AI-driven automation for business functions including IT, operations, marketing, sales, finance, customer experience, and HR. Its business model is SaaS-based, offering no-code and low-code automation tools with extensive app integrations and AI capabilities. The company targets medium to large enterprises and has a strong partnership ecosystem, including its parent company Celonis. Customer satisfaction is high, supported by positive reviews on platforms like Capterra and G2. The platform's flexibility and AI integration provide competitive advantages in a growing market for intelligent automation solutions. Strategic growth is supported by community engagement, educational resources, and a partner directory.

Security posture

Make demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, GDPR and SOC 2 Type II compliance, encryption, and single sign-on capabilities. The presence of a bug bounty program and ethics & compliance links indicate a proactive security culture. However, the website lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and security.txt files, which could enhance protection and transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Incident response contact channels are implied but not explicitly detailed on the main site. Overall, the security measures align well with enterprise expectations but could benefit from additional header implementations and clearer incident response documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Add a security.txt file at the root domain to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  3. Enhance incident response information by providing explicit security contact emails and procedures on the website.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to ensure no vulnerable libraries are included.
  5. Continue to maintain and update compliance certifications and communicate these clearly to build customer trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Make
Description
Automate your work. Make allows you to visually build, scale and automate AI and agentic workflows. User friendly no-code integration tool.
Key services
AI workflow automation, Agentic automation, Pre-built app integrations, Enterprise automation solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, JavaScript, RudderStack analytics, Cookielaw.org cookie consent
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • GDPR and SOC 2 Type II compliance
  • Single sign-on (SSO)
  • Bug bounty program

Analytics and tracking

Services
RudderStack
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
RudderStack
Marketing tools
CookieLaw.org consent management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking
  2. Strong focus on AI-powered workflow automation for enterprises
  3. Clear privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  4. Multiple social media and community engagement channels
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  6. Good security posture with compliance certifications
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, ensuring server-side rendering and optimized performance. It uses RudderStack for analytics and Cookielaw.org for cookie consent management, indicating attention to privacy compliance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance is fast with efficient asset loading and video integration. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless approach. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The technical infrastructure supports a scalable and secure SaaS platform, though some improvements in security headers and incident response transparency are recommended to reduce technical risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 71/100 −1Medium27 findingsView report
  2. 72/100 −1Medium26 findingsView report
  3. 73/100Medium21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with make.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review make.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.