Skip to main content

Security report for majoruskola.lv

Jūrmalas Majoru vidusskola · Education · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jūrmalas Majoru vidusskola is a well-established public educational institution in Jūrmala, Latvia, with a history dating back to 1879. The school provides primary and secondary education and engages actively with its community through various projects and programs. The website serves as an information portal for students, parents, and staff, offering news, educational resources, and contact information. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using Bootstrap and jQuery, with integration of Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site is secured with HTTPS and shows moderate performance and mobile optimization. However, it lacks some modern security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are important for GDPR compliance. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting full domain trust verification. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and serves its educational purpose effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching majoruskola.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention majoruskola.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for majoruskola.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The school operates as a public institution funded by the local government, targeting students and parents in the Jūrmala region. It holds a strong local market position with a long history and community trust. The business model is non-commercial, focusing on education and community service. The website supports this by providing detailed information on admissions, programs, events, and policies. Partnerships with local and national educational platforms are evident through external links. The presence of EU-funded projects and certifications like eTwinning status indicates active engagement in educational quality and innovation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The site uses nonce tokens for AJAX requests, indicating some security awareness. Lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency. GDPR compliance is partially addressed via a privacy policy page, but cookie consent is missing. Overall, the site is reasonably secure but could improve in security best practices and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and inform users about tracking.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Attempt to retrieve and monitor WHOIS data regularly to ensure domain registration legitimacy and detect any suspicious changes.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jūrmalas Majoru vidusskola
Description
Jūrmalas Majoru vidusskola is a public educational institution in Jūrmala, Latvia, providing primary and secondary education. The school has a long history dating back to 1879 and offers various educational programs, extracurricular activities, and community projects.
Key services
Primary and secondary education, Extracurricular activities, Community and educational projects, Information and resources for parents and students
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Fonts, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure forms with nonce tokens

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based educational institution site in Latvian language.
  2. Content is rich with news, announcements, and educational resources.
  3. No privacy or cookie banner detected despite GDPR relevance.
  4. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  7. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking.
  8. No visible contact emails or phone numbers in the main HTML; contact page likely contains details.
  9. Site uses HTTPS with valid SSL.
  10. No security headers detected in HTML source.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. It integrates Google Fonts and Google Analytics for typography and visitor tracking respectively. The site loads scripts asynchronously to improve performance. The HTML is well-structured with meta tags for viewport and charset. Accessibility features like skip links and screen-reader text are present but could be enhanced. SEO basics are covered with meta titles and descriptions. The site lacks advanced SEO optimizations and some accessibility best practices. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a mid-sized educational website with room for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with majoruskola.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review majoruskola.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.