Skip to main content

Security report for maiscrm.com

上海群之脉信息科技有限公司 · Technology · China

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

群脉SCRM由上海群之脉信息科技有限公司运营,专注于提供SaaS级客户关系管理(CRM)解决方案,涵盖智能营销、私域流量运营、导购管理及分销渠道管理等多项服务。该公司定位为一站式SCRM定制解决方案服务商,面向企业客户,尤其是需要全渠道精准营销和新零售场景的中大型企业。网站内容丰富,设计专业,支持移动端访问,体现出较高的数字化成熟度。技术栈采用现代JavaScript框架(Nuxt.js、Ant Design)及腾讯和百度的API服务,显示出良好的技术基础和生态融合能力。安全方面,网站启用HTTPS,声称具备多层次安全体系和7x24小时实时防护,但缺少公开的安全政策和安全事件响应信息。WHOIS信息缺失,存在一定的信任风险。整体风险适中,建议完善隐私合规和安全披露以提升信任度。

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MSSQL

      Port 1433 (MSSQL) is publicly accessible - MSSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MSSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching maiscrm.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
50
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

群脉SCRM在中国市场定位为专业的SCRM解决方案提供商,业务涵盖互动营销、智能营销、全域会员管理、智慧导购、私域零售及终端运营平台等。其商业模式为基于SaaS的企业服务,目标客户为需要数字化客户管理和营销自动化的企业。网站展示了多个行业客户案例,表明其在快消、母婴、美妆、医药健康等领域有一定市场渗透。合作伙伴网络广泛,涵盖数据分析、短信平台及行业报告等多个领域。缺乏公开的财务和成立年份信息,规模推测为中型企业。整体业务模式成熟,具备较强的市场竞争力和客户服务能力。

Security posture

网站采用HTTPS保障数据传输安全,技术架构基于微服务和容器化部署,具备弹性扩容能力,声称服务超过2亿用户。多层次安全体系和7x24小时实时防护机制体现较高的安全意识。然而,缺少安全策略、事件响应联系方式及漏洞披露渠道,安全头部信息未见,存在合规和透明度不足问题。WHOIS信息缺失增加潜在风险。建议加强安全政策公开,完善安全事件响应流程,发布漏洞披露政策以提升安全成熟度和客户信任。

Recommendations

  1. 发布并公开详细的隐私政策和Cookie政策,确保GDPR及相关法规合规。
  2. 增加安全策略和事件响应联系方式,提升安全透明度和客户信任。
  3. 实施并配置安全HTTP头部(如CSP、X-Frame-Options等)以增强防护。
  4. 建立漏洞披露渠道或安全.txt文件,鼓励安全研究者报告问题。
  5. 核实并完善WHOIS信息,确保域名注册信息的透明和合法性。

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
上海群之脉信息科技有限公司
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
上海群之脉信息科技有限公司
Description
群脉SCRM是一款自主开发的SaaS级CRM客户关系管理平台,提供一站式SCRM定制解决方案,涵盖企业营销自动化,私域流量代运营,导购管理软件,分销渠道管理,门店智慧导购管理等功能,助力企业实现全渠道精准营销。
Key services
互动营销, 智能营销, 全域会员管理, 智慧导购, 私域零售, 终端运营平台, 用户数据平台
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Vue.js (Nuxt.js), Ant Design (Antd), Tencent Map API, Baidu Analytics, Containerization (mentioned in content)
Frameworks
Nuxt.js, Ant Design
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Multi-layer security system mentioned
  • 7x24 real-time protection claimed
  • Microservices architecture and containerization for stability

Analytics and tracking

Services
Baidu Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Baidu Analytics
Marketing tools
Tencent Map API, Baidu Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Chinese language targeting enterprise clients.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages detected, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and physical address in Shanghai.
  4. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  5. Website uses modern JavaScript frameworks and APIs from Tencent and Baidu.
  6. No obvious security headers detected in provided data.
  7. WHOIS data missing, which is a significant anomaly.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. Multiple external partner domains linked in footer.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

网站采用Nuxt.js和Ant Design构建,结合腾讯地图API和百度统计,技术栈现代且生态丰富。页面设计响应式,适配移动端,性能表现中等。缺少CMS迹象,可能为定制开发。未检测到明显技术债务,但缺少安全头部配置。网站内容结构清晰,SEO优化良好。建议提升无障碍支持和性能优化,完善安全配置以降低潜在风险。
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with maiscrm.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review maiscrm.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.