Skip to main content

Security report for magicres.de

Magic.Res GmbH · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Magic.Res GmbH operates a specialized web-based Computer Reservation System (CRS) with integrated price comparison functionalities tailored for the European tourism market. Their platform serves travel agencies, tour operators, and related service providers by aggregating and enabling booking of diverse tourist products. The company positions itself as a niche technology provider with a focus on efficiency and comprehensive content delivery for travel professionals. Technically, the website employs established web technologies including jQuery and Bootstrap, delivering a moderately performant and mobile-optimized user experience. The site structure is clear and professional, though it lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom or lightweight solution. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are important for GDPR compliance and modern web security best practices. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. WHOIS data is minimal but consistent with the business location and domain usage. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy business front with moderate technical maturity and some gaps in security and privacy compliance. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy mechanisms, and contact transparency would enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching magicres.de

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Magic.Res GmbH targets the European travel industry with a B2B SaaS model focused on reservation and price comparison systems. Their competitive advantage lies in aggregating multiple tour operators and providing a unified booking interface. The company serves a niche market of travel agents, call centers, and web agencies, supporting efficient sales workflows. News updates and partner references indicate active business operations and market engagement. The business is small-sized and technology-driven, with no public parent or subsidiary affiliations. Revenue streams likely derive from software licensing or service fees. Growth potential exists through expanding partnerships and enhancing platform capabilities.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate. HTTPS is in use, but the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces protection against common web threats. No public security policies or incident response contacts are provided, limiting transparency and preparedness perception. GDPR compliance is partially addressed via a privacy policy, but lack of cookie consent mechanisms is a compliance gap. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, the security culture appears basic and would benefit from formalized policies and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance web security.
  2. Deploy a cookie consent banner/mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and preparedness.
  4. Add visible company contact emails and phone numbers on the website to enhance business credibility and user support.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any hidden vulnerabilities and improve overall security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Magic.Res GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Magic.Res GmbH
Description
Magic.Res ist ein webbasiertes Computerreservierungssystem, das den kompletten touristischen Content für den europäischen Markt liefert. Es ermöglicht Abfrage, Vergleich und Buchung einer Vielzahl touristischer Leistungen in einem einzigen System. Die Plattform richtet sich an Reisebüros, Veranstalter, Travel Agents, Call-Center und Web-Agenturen.
Key services
Computerreservierungssystem (CRS), Preisvergleichssystem (COMPARE), Admin-Bereich für statistische Auswertungen, Mid- & Backoffice Anbindung
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Fancybox
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage assumed (URL is https)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in German and targeted at European travel industry professionals.
  3. No forms detected on the homepage; login page likely contains forms but not analyzed here.
  4. No social media links or contact emails explicitly found in the HTML content.
  5. No explicit cookie consent mechanism found despite GDPR relevance.
  6. Website uses standard web technologies with moderate performance and good mobile optimization.
  7. Security headers are not visible in the HTML content; SSL assumed but not verified here.
  8. WHOIS data is minimal but domain status is active and name servers are consistent.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a classic web technology stack with jQuery and Bootstrap for UI components and responsiveness. The site is custom-built without a detectable CMS, which can reduce attack surface but may increase maintenance overhead. Performance is moderate with no obvious optimization issues, and mobile responsiveness is good. SEO is basic with meta keywords and description but lacks advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. Accessibility features are minimal. The hosting provider and infrastructure details are not disclosed. There is an opportunity to modernize the tech stack and improve SEO and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with magicres.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review magicres.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.