Skip to main content

Security report for madebyoll.in

Ollin Boer Bohan · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website madebyoll.in is a personal technical blog operated by Ollin Boer Bohan, focusing on AI, neural networks, and machine learning projects. It serves as a platform to share detailed project posts and technical insights, targeting technology enthusiasts and developers interested in advanced AI topics. The site positions itself as a niche personal blog rather than a commercial enterprise, with content primarily consisting of project summaries and posts. From a technical perspective, the website uses standard HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript with asynchronous scripts to enhance typography and layout. There is no indication of a CMS or advanced frameworks, suggesting a lightweight and manually maintained site. Mobile optimization is good, and the site structure is clear, though SEO and accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, with no evident use of analytics or tracking technologies. Security posture is minimal; no HTTPS status or security headers were detected in the provided data, and no privacy or cookie policies are present. Contact information is limited to a single email address in the footer, with no dedicated security or incident response contacts. The absence of security best practices and compliance documentation indicates a low security maturity level, appropriate for a personal blog but not for commercial or sensitive data handling. Overall, the site is safe and suitable for general audiences, with no adult or questionable content. The domain registration data aligns with the website's personal nature, supporting legitimacy. However, the lack of HTTPS and privacy policies are notable gaps. Strategic improvements in security and compliance would enhance trust and professionalism.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching madebyoll.in

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as a personal blog showcasing AI and neural network projects by an individual named Ollin Boer Bohan. It targets a niche audience of AI researchers, developers, and technology enthusiasts. The business model is non-commercial, focusing on content sharing and personal branding rather than revenue generation. There are no indications of partnerships, subsidiaries, or formal business structures. The site’s market position is that of a specialized technical resource with a small but focused audience. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not evident. The ecosystem is limited to social media presence on GitHub, Mastodon, and Twitter, supporting community engagement and content dissemination.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is basic and lacks several critical elements. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or SSL certificate usage, which is a significant security risk. Security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are absent, increasing vulnerability to common web attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. Incident response mechanisms and security contact channels are not provided, limiting the ability to handle security incidents effectively. The site does not use analytics or tracking, reducing privacy concerns but also limiting user behavior insights. Overall, the site is suitable for low-risk personal use but requires substantial improvements for professional or commercial use.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure data transmission and improve trust.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users about data handling.
  3. Configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  4. Provide clear contact information for security incidents, including dedicated security or abuse email addresses.
  5. Consider integrating basic analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to monitor site performance and user engagement.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ollin Boer Bohan
Description
'Stack more layers' enthusiast
Key services
technical blog posts, AI and neural network project documentation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal technical blog focused on AI and neural network projects.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact information limited to an email address in the footer.
  4. No security policies or incident response information provided.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. No advertising or affiliate marketing present.
  7. Website uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with asynchronous scripts for typography fixes.
  8. No CMS or hosting provider information detected.
  9. No security headers or HTTPS status available from provided data.
  10. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using basic web technologies including HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript. It uses asynchronous scripts to fix typography and layout issues, indicating attention to presentation quality. There is no detected CMS or advanced framework, suggesting manual site management. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has a clear content structure, though SEO and accessibility features are minimal. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not available from the provided data. Performance is moderate, with no heavy external dependencies or tracking scripts. Technical risks include lack of HTTPS and security headers, which could expose users to interception and attacks. Modernization opportunities include adopting HTTPS, improving SEO, and enhancing accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with madebyoll.in. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review madebyoll.in.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.