Skip to main content

Security report for macro4.com

Macro 4 · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and GDPR outside view.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Macro 4 is a technology company specializing in enterprise information management solutions, focusing on customer communications management, customer self-service, and legacy application decommissioning. The company positions itself as a facilitator of digital transformation for enterprise clients. The website is built using modern web technologies such as Gatsby and Bootstrap, indicating a contemporary digital infrastructure. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, despite the professional appearance and branding consistency. Security posture is moderate with no detected security headers or explicit policies, and privacy compliance is low due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website is functional and professional but requires improvements in transparency and security to enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching macro4.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
49
Security headers
90
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Macro 4 operates in the B2B technology sector, targeting enterprises seeking digital transformation solutions. Its parent company is UNICOM Global, which is confirmed by social media and meta tags. The business model revolves around software and services for information management, with a focus on legacy system modernization and customer engagement solutions. The company appears to have a medium-sized market presence with consistent branding and good content quality. However, the lack of publicly available contact information and WHOIS data may impact customer trust and regulatory compliance. There is no evidence of affiliate programs or advertising networks, suggesting a direct sales approach.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS (implied by URL) but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which are best practices for web security. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present, and no security certifications are displayed. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, which reduces privacy risks but also limits user behavior insights. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing standard security headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and establishing clear incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance website security.
  3. Clarify domain registration details and ensure WHOIS data is accurate and publicly available to improve legitimacy.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information.
  5. Enhance website accessibility and SEO by adding ARIA attributes and structured data beyond Open Graph.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Macro 4
Description
Accelerate your digital transformation with our solutions for customer communications management, customer self-service and legacy application decommissioning
Key services
customer communications management, customer self-service, legacy application decommissioning
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (Gatsby 5.16.1), Bootstrap 4.4.1, JavaScript
Frameworks
Gatsby
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or domain is unregistered, which is unusual.
  3. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the HTML snippet.
  5. Website uses modern frontend technologies (Gatsby, React, Bootstrap).
  6. No security headers or explicit security policies detected in the HTML content.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  8. Content is business-focused, targeting enterprise clients for information management solutions.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Gatsby, a React-based static site generator, combined with Bootstrap 4.4.1 for styling. This indicates a modern, performant frontend architecture optimized for SEO and mobile responsiveness. The site uses standard meta tags and Open Graph tags for social media integration. No CMS or backend platform is detected, suggesting a static or headless architecture. Hosting provider details are not available from the provided data. Performance is moderate, with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. There is an opportunity to improve technical SEO and accessibility compliance further. No analytics or third-party tracking scripts were found, which may limit marketing insights but enhances privacy.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with macro4.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review macro4.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.