Skip to main content

Security report for luxoft.com

Luxoft, a DXC Technology Company · Technology · Switzerland

High risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Luxoft, a DXC Technology Company founded in 2000 and headquartered in Switzerland, is a global enterprise technology services provider specializing in software engineering and digital transformation. The company serves multiple industries including automotive, finance, telecommunications, energy, and retail, offering a broad portfolio of services such as cloud solutions, data analytics, machine learning, and legacy modernization. Luxoft positions itself as a trusted partner for enterprises seeking to modernize IT systems and achieve sustainable digital advantage. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, structured data, and clear navigation targeting enterprise clients worldwide. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks and integrates advanced marketing and analytics tools with consent management, indicating a high level of digital maturity. However, the security posture is weakened by an invalid SSL certificate and lack of TLS support, which poses significant risks to secure communications and user trust. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, Luxoft demonstrates strong business credibility and professionalism but should urgently remediate SSL/TLS issues to enhance security and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching luxoft.com

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
90
Email security
50
DNS health
50
Network security
85
GDPR outside view
18
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Luxoft operates as a large enterprise B2B technology services provider with a diversified portfolio across key sectors such as automotive, finance, and telecommunications. Its competitive advantage lies in deep industry expertise, a broad global footprint, and partnerships with leading technology vendors like Microsoft, AWS, and Nasdaq. The business model focuses on delivering bespoke software engineering and digital transformation solutions, supported by a strong marketing and analytics ecosystem. The presence of detailed case studies and global presence information signals a mature and well-established operation. Growth indicators include continuous service expansion and strategic partnerships. The company’s parent, DXC Technology, further strengthens its market position. Luxoft’s operations are supported by a professional website that effectively communicates its offerings and trust signals.

Security posture

The website implements several security best practices including strict content security policies, X-Frame-Options set to DENY, XSS protection, and a strict referrer policy. However, the critical failure of having an invalid SSL certificate and no enabled TLS protocols severely undermines the security posture. This exposes users to potential interception and data integrity risks. The absence of OCSP stapling and session resumption further reduces security and performance. No explicit incident response or security policy pages were found, indicating potential gaps in transparency and readiness. Privacy compliance is strong with GDPR-aligned cookie consent and privacy policies. The overall security maturity is moderate but requires urgent remediation of SSL/TLS issues to meet enterprise security expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Urgently fix the SSL certificate to ensure it is valid and trusted by browsers.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) to secure communications.
  3. Activate HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload flags to enforce HTTPS.
  4. Implement OCSP stapling to improve certificate revocation checking performance.
  5. Publish explicit security and incident response policies to improve transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Luxoft, a DXC Technology Company
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted behind Imperva CDN and served by nginx 1.27.5. It uses modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery 3.7.1 and Bootstrap for responsive design. Marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, CrazyEgg, Marketo, and Facebook SDK are integrated with a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism via OneTrust. The CMS identified is Bolt. Performance metrics were not provided but the site uses lazy loading and preloading techniques indicating optimization efforts. Accessibility is basic but present. SEO is well implemented with comprehensive meta tags and structured JSON-LD data. The main technical risk is the invalid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, which must be addressed to avoid security and trust issues.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with luxoft.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review luxoft.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.