Skip to main content

Security report for lunchbox.schule

Education · N/a

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website lunchbox.schule is an online platform designed to facilitate the ordering of healthy lunch menus and snack packages for school students. It targets schools and their students or parents, providing a convenient online booking system that requires yearly registration due to data privacy considerations. The platform is niche-focused within the education sector, aiming to promote healthy eating habits in schools. The website is powered by TYPO3 CMS and incorporates JavaScript libraries including jQuery and custom QR code scanning scripts, indicating a moderate level of technical maturity. The presence of Matomo analytics shows an intent to monitor user interactions, although privacy compliance measures such as cookie or privacy policies are absent. Security posture is moderate; the site uses HTTPS and secure form submission but lacks visible security headers and anti-CSRF protections. No WHOIS registrant data is publicly available due to TLD restrictions, but the domain appears legitimate and consistent with the business purpose. Overall, the site is functional and safe but would benefit from enhanced privacy disclosures and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lunchbox.schule

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
50
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Lunchbox.schule operates in the educational catering niche, providing a digital ordering service for healthy school meals. Its business model relies on annual user registrations and online management of meal bookings. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its focus on health-conscious meal options and ease of use for schools. The lack of public company information and contact details limits transparency but is somewhat mitigated by the specialized nature of the service. The use of TYPO3 CMS and custom extensions suggests a tailored solution rather than an off-the-shelf product. The absence of visible partnerships or subsidiaries indicates a small-scale operation. Growth potential may depend on expanding school partnerships and improving user trust through enhanced compliance and communication.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is used, and form submissions are via POST with password fields marked for RSA encryption, indicating some attention to secure data handling. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces protection against common web attacks. No anti-CSRF tokens were detected in the login form, which could expose the site to cross-site request forgery risks. The lack of published privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and security contact information are not provided, limiting the ability to report or respond to security issues. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are evident, improvements are needed to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies clearly accessible on the website to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  3. Incorporate anti-CSRF tokens in all forms to prevent cross-site request forgery attacks.
  4. Publish contact information for security incidents and data protection officer details to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and update third-party libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain a strong security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website for ordering healthy lunch menus and snack packages at schools with online booking management after registration.
Key services
Healthy lunch menu ordering, Snack package ordering, Online booking management
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery 3.3.1, IBAN validation JS, QR code scanner JS
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS implied by script URLs
  • Form uses POST method
  • Password input field with RSA encryption attribute (data-rsa-encryption)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an online platform for ordering healthy school meals and snacks
  2. Uses TYPO3 CMS with custom extensions
  3. No public WHOIS data available due to TLD restrictions
  4. No privacy or cookie policies found on homepage
  5. Login form collects username and password with POST method
  6. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on homepage
  7. Matomo analytics used for tracking
  8. No security headers detected in provided data
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  10. Content is safe and appropriate for general audience
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, a mature open-source content management system, with custom JavaScript components including jQuery 3.3.1 and QR code scanning functionality. The site uses asynchronous loading for analytics scripts (Matomo) and includes IBAN validation scripts, indicating some attention to input validation. The CSS is compressed and optimized for screen and print media. Mobile optimization is good, with viewport and apple-mobile-web-app-capable meta tags present. However, accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal with only a generic title tag and no Open Graph or structured data detected. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading but no advanced optimization techniques evident. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the data. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lunchbox.schule. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lunchbox.schule.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.