Skip to main content

Security report for lunalabs.it

LunaLabs · Technology · Italy

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

38/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LunaLabs is a technology-oriented website with a domain registered in Italy since 2018, indicating a mature presence. The site uses modern web technologies such as Angular and includes cookie consent mechanisms via Iubenda, but lacks critical business information such as contact details, privacy policy, and terms of service. The absence of HTTPS and a valid SSL certificate significantly undermines the security posture of the website. Technical infrastructure shows use of modern fonts and frameworks but lacks performance optimization and accessibility features. Security best practices are minimal, with no security headers or advanced configurations detected. Overall, the website presents a low trustworthiness profile due to missing compliance and security features, and limited business transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lunalabs.it

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
38

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website appears to represent a small technology entity named LunaLabs, likely targeting an Italian audience given the domain and language context. The business model and market positioning are unclear due to lack of explicit content or descriptions. No contact or social media channels are provided, limiting user engagement and trust. The use of Google MX records suggests email handling via Google Workspace, but no direct emails are published. The cookie consent implementation indicates some awareness of privacy regulations, though no privacy policy is found. The lack of domain protection locks is a minor risk factor. Overall, the business intelligence points to a small, possibly early-stage or low-profile technology company with room for improvement in transparency and digital presence.

Security posture

The security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS, invalid SSL configuration, and lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or POODLE are detected, but the lack of encryption exposes users to risks. The cookie consent mechanism is present but without a linked privacy policy, compliance is questionable. DNSSEC and CAA records are not enabled, reducing DNS security. Incident response and security policy information are not found, indicating low maturity in security governance. The domain registration is transparent but lacks domain locks, which could be improved. Overall, the site is vulnerable to interception and lacks critical security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a valid SSL certificate and enforce HTTPS across the site.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages.
  3. Add clear contact information including email and phone for business credibility.
  4. Enable security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  5. Enable DNSSEC and CAA records to improve DNS security and certificate issuance control.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Angular framework with modern fonts (Roboto, Manrope, Mulish) and Material Icons. Cookie consent is managed via Iubenda scripts. Hosting is provided by Seeweb as indicated by DNS nameservers. The site lacks HTTPS and has no SSL certificate, which is a critical technical deficiency. Performance metrics are missing, but the absence of optimization hints at slow loading times. Accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic, with minimal metadata and no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. No CMS is identified. The site uses modern JavaScript modules and integrity attributes for scripts, indicating some attention to security in resource loading. Overall, the technical implementation is modern but incomplete and insecure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lunalabs.it. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lunalabs.it.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.