Skip to main content

Security report for luganodes.com

Luganodes · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Luganodes is a professional institutional-grade staking service provider specializing in blockchain infrastructure and staking solutions across multiple Proof-of-Stake networks. The company holds a strong market position as a top validator on networks like Polygon and Tron, with a client base staking assets worth over $2.5 billion and boasting 99% network uptime. Their services target enterprises and individual investors seeking hassle-free staking with robust security and operational efficiency. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as Gatsby and React, optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, Luganodes demonstrates adherence to enterprise-grade standards with certifications including ISO 27001, GDPR compliance, and SOC2 Type II audits, alongside third-party risk assessments and insurance coverage. However, the absence of domain WHOIS data and lack of visible privacy and cookie policies introduce trust and compliance concerns. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front but would benefit from enhanced transparency and compliance documentation to strengthen its security posture and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching luganodes.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Luganodes operates in the blockchain technology sector, focusing on staking services that enable clients to delegate digital assets securely and efficiently. Their business model revolves around providing infrastructure and operational support for staking across 50+ live networks, positioning themselves as a leader in staking volume globally. The company leverages partnerships with infrastructure providers and security auditors to maintain high availability and trust. Growth indicators include a large staked asset base and AAA rating on Staking Rewards. The target customer segments include institutional investors and individual crypto holders seeking reliable staking solutions. Strategic observations highlight the company's emphasis on security certifications and risk mitigation, which are critical competitive advantages in the blockchain staking market.

Security posture

Luganodes exhibits a strong security maturity level with multiple certifications and third-party audits reinforcing their operational security. The website enforces HTTPS and includes some security headers like X-Frame-Options. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data in the analyzed content. However, the lack of a published privacy policy, cookie consent mechanism, and incident response contact details indicates gaps in compliance and transparency. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file suggests limited formal channels for security issue reporting. Overall, the security culture appears robust operationally but could improve in public-facing compliance and incident management communication.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent banner to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add additional security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen web security.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents, including dedicated security or abuse email addresses.
  4. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Verify and publish domain WHOIS registration details to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Luganodes
Description
Luganodes is a AAA rated institutional-grade staking service provider and one of the top leaders in staking volume. Globally, Luganodes’s client base stakes digital assets across 22+ PoS live networks with 99% uptime. It is one of the top validator on the Polygon network and the super representative on the Tron network.
Key services
institutional-grade staking service, staking across 50+ live networks, validator services on Polygon and Tron networks
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Gatsby, Tailwind CSS, Google Fonts, Typekit Fonts
Frameworks
Gatsby
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • X-Frame-Options header set to DENY
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts
  • No forms detected that collect sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No privacy policy or cookie policy detected on the main page or indicated in metadata.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content provided.
  4. Security best practices partially implemented; some headers present but others missing.
  5. No forms detected that collect user data, reducing privacy risk.
  6. WHOIS data missing, which is a critical red flag for domain legitimacy.
  7. Website uses modern technologies and is mobile optimized.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  9. No social media links explicitly found in the provided content.
  10. Certifications and security claims prominently displayed, enhancing trust.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Gatsby, with styling via Tailwind CSS and fonts loaded from Google Fonts and Adobe Typekit. The site is statically generated, contributing to fast load times and excellent mobile optimization. Accessibility features appear adequate, and SEO meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards are well implemented. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected in the provided content, indicating minimal user tracking. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The technical implementation reflects a well-maintained and modern digital presence with opportunities to enhance security headers and compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with luganodes.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review luganodes.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.