Skip to main content

Security report for ltmc.lv

Tālākizglītības mācību centrs pilsoniskai sabiedrībai · Education · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website represents the Tālākizglītības mācību centrs pilsoniskai sabiedrībai, an educational center focused on providing continuing education and training primarily for judges, court employees, and legal professionals in Latvia. It offers publicly accessible seminars and training events, with detailed information and registration facilitated through a dedicated Learning Information System (MIS). The organization positions itself as a niche educational provider within the Latvian legal and civic society sectors. Technically, the website is built on the Mozello CMS platform, leveraging Amazon CloudFront CDN for content delivery. It uses common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Fancybox for UI enhancements and includes a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO and accessibility practices, though some improvements in security headers and accessibility could be made. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements client-side form validation. However, no advanced security headers were detected, and there is no public vulnerability disclosure or incident response information. The use of Google Analytics indicates moderate user tracking, balanced with privacy compliance measures such as cookie consent and a privacy policy. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and aligned with its educational mission. The lack of WHOIS data due to query limits limits domain registration insights, but the site’s content and contact information support its legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy, and improving accessibility compliance to strengthen the security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ltmc.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the education sector, specifically targeting legal professionals and judiciary staff in Latvia. Its business model revolves around organizing and delivering continuing education seminars and training programs, both publicly accessible and specialized. The website indicates a small-sized entity with a focused market niche, leveraging partnerships with governmental or judicial bodies as implied by the domain and content. Revenue streams likely include seminar fees and possibly government or EU funding for projects. The presence of social media channels and a subscription form suggests active engagement with its audience and efforts to grow its reach. The use of Mozello CMS and Amazon CloudFront indicates a cost-effective digital infrastructure suitable for a small to medium-sized non-profit or educational institution.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent mechanisms are in place, supporting GDPR compliance. Client-side validation is implemented for forms, reducing input risks. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No public incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency and readiness perception. The use of third-party libraries like jQuery 2.2.4, which is outdated, may pose potential vulnerabilities if not regularly updated. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be improved by adopting best practices and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting.
  3. Update all third-party libraries to their latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards, improving usability for all users.
  5. Provide public incident response contact information to demonstrate preparedness and build trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tālākizglītības mācību centrs pilsoniskai sabiedrībai
Description
TMCPS organizes training and support events primarily for judges and court staff, also publicly available training for lawyers and other interested parties. Information about events and pricing is available on the website and the Learning Information System (MIS).
Key services
Continuing education seminars, Training events for judiciary and legal professionals, Publicly accessible training programs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, Bannerplay, ResponsiveVideos, Mozello platform scripts
Platforms
Mozello CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • Form input validation with client-side checks

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on continuing education for legal professionals in Latvia.
  3. Uses Mozello CMS with Amazon CloudFront CDN for hosting and delivery.
  4. Includes privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  5. Contact information is clearly presented including email, phone, and physical address.
  6. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  7. Google Analytics is used for traffic analysis.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit, but no negative indicators found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Mozello CMS hosted on Amazon CloudFront CDN, ensuring reliable content delivery and moderate performance. The tech stack includes jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, Bannerplay, and ResponsiveVideos scripts, which provide interactive and responsive UI elements. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes SEO-friendly meta tags and canonical links. However, the use of older jQuery versions suggests some technical debt. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No advanced frameworks or server-side technologies are evident from the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small educational site but has room for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ltmc.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ltmc.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.