Skip to main content

Security report for ltgplc.com

Learning Technologies Group · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Learning Technologies Group (LTG) is a well-established UK-based leader in the digital learning and talent management sector, serving large organizations globally. The company offers a broad portfolio of digital learning platforms and talent management solutions, positioning itself as a strategic partner for enterprises undergoing digital transformation. The website reflects a mature, professional business with strong branding, clear market positioning, and comprehensive content tailored to its B2B audience. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries and SEO optimizations, delivering a good user experience with mobile responsiveness and accessibility considerations. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though there is room for improvement in publishing explicit security policies and headers. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, LTG’s digital presence aligns well with its business stature, supporting trust and credibility.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of ltgplc.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ltgplc.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
45
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LTG operates in the technology sector focusing on workplace digital learning and talent management, targeting large enterprises and organizations. Its business model revolves around providing SaaS platforms and services that enable digital transformation in learning and talent development. The company benefits from a strong market position as a recognized leader, supported by industry awards and strategic partnerships. Its acquisition by private equity firm General Atlantic indicates financial strength and growth potential. The website’s portfolio section highlights multiple subsidiaries and brands under LTG, indicating a diversified offering. Recruitment is managed via a partner domain (ltg.breezy.hr), showing an integrated ecosystem. The company’s global footprint and focus on innovation position it well for continued expansion in a growing market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive information in the HTML content. Use of asynchronous loading for analytics and marketing scripts reduces performance impact and potential security risks. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies represent gaps in transparency and defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, limiting external reporting channels. The site does not expose contact emails or phone numbers for security incidents, which could hinder incident response. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a corporate site but could be enhanced by adopting best practices in security headers, policy publication, and vulnerability disclosure.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and incident response procedures.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Add explicit security contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Learning Technologies Group
Description
Learning Technologies Group (LTG) is a market leader in workplace digital learning and talent management with presence in over 30 countries. They offer large organisations digital learning and talent management solutions to support digital transformation.
Key services
digital learning platforms, talent management solutions, workplace learning innovation
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.0, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Slick Carousel, Magnific Popup, ScrollReveal, FitVids
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and analytics scripts loaded asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Pardot
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Pardot (go.ltgplc.com)
Marketing tools
Pardot marketing automation
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well maintained.
  2. Content is comprehensive and relevant to the business domain.
  3. Strong presence of trust indicators such as awards and industry recognition.
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  5. Good privacy and cookie policy presence with consent mechanism.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  8. No direct company emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content; contact form is primary contact method.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and various UI libraries like Slick Carousel and ScrollReveal. The site uses Yoast SEO plugin for search engine optimization and loads resources asynchronously to improve performance. Mobile optimization and accessibility are well addressed, providing a good user experience across devices. The site’s performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by optimizing script loading and caching strategies. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The site structure and metadata are well implemented, including Open Graph tags and JSON-LD structured data for enhanced SEO and social sharing. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals effectively with room for incremental improvements in performance and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 72/100Medium32 findingsView report
  2. 72/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ltgplc.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ltgplc.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.