Skip to main content

Security report for lovable.dev

Lovable · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lovable is a technology company providing an AI-powered SaaS platform that enables users to build software products and websites through a chat interface. Positioned as an innovative no-code/low-code solution, it targets developers, entrepreneurs, and teams seeking rapid software development with AI assistance. The platform offers tiered plans including Free, Pro, and Enterprise, supporting collaboration, integrations, and custom domain publishing. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, hosted on Netlify, and integrates with services like Firebase, Supabase, and GitHub. The site demonstrates excellent design, mobile optimization, and SEO practices, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and dedicated security and abuse reporting pages, though the absence of a security.txt file is noted. Privacy compliance is robust with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-positioned in its market niche.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lovable.dev

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
45
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Lovable operates in the technology sector, focusing on AI-driven software development tools. Its business model is SaaS with subscription tiers catering to individual developers and enterprises. The company leverages community engagement through Discord, Reddit, and social media, enhancing its ecosystem. Key services include AI chat-based app and website creation, project collaboration, and integrations with popular developer tools. The platform's market position is that of an innovative challenger in the no-code/low-code space, emphasizing AI assistance. Growth indicators include active community channels and continuous feature development. Partnerships and subdomains indicate a structured service offering for enterprise clients and documentation. The company maintains comprehensive legal and security documentation, supporting credibility.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and dedicated pages for security policies and abuse reporting. The use of role-based access control and integrations with secure identity providers like Netlify Identity and Firebase further strengthen security. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. However, the absence of a publicly accessible security.txt file and explicit certifications or compliance attestations represent areas for improvement. Incident response contact channels are available but could be more prominently displayed. Overall, the security maturity is high, supporting business continuity and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures and improve transparency.
  2. Consider obtaining and displaying recognized security certifications (e.g., ISO 27001) to enhance trust.
  3. Enhance visibility of incident response contacts on the website for quicker reporting and resolution.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Document and communicate data retention policies clearly to align with privacy regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lovable
Description
Build software products, using only a chat interface
Key services
AI chat interface for building software products, Project collaboration and workspace management, Integrations with GitHub and Supabase, Custom domain publishing, Role-based access control
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, TypeScript, Tailwind CSS, Firebase, Netlify Identity, Supabase, GitHub integration
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Platforms
Netlify
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure cookies
  • Use of CSP
  • Role-based access control in app
  • Security and abuse reporting pages

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics, Dub Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics, Rewardful
Marketing tools
Rewardful, Plausible Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern web technologies and frameworks
  2. Strong focus on AI-powered software building
  3. Clear and comprehensive legal and security documentation
  4. Active community presence via multiple social platforms
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity
  6. Good privacy and cookie compliance with consent mechanisms
  7. No direct contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed
Technical notes

Notes

Lovable's website is built on a modern and scalable technology stack including Next.js and React, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile responsiveness. Hosting on Netlify provides reliable infrastructure with CDN and SSL support. The site uses Tailwind CSS for styling and integrates with Firebase and Supabase for backend services. Analytics are implemented via privacy-focused Plausible and Dub Analytics. The technical implementation reflects a well-maintained and contemporary web application with good SEO and accessibility practices. Opportunities exist to further enhance technical maturity by integrating automated security scanning and continuous compliance monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lovable.dev. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lovable.dev.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.