Skip to main content

Security report for londonartstudies.com

London Art Studies · Education · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

London Art Studies is a UK-based online education platform specializing in art history classes delivered through curated video content and memberships. The company targets art lovers and students seeking accessible, high-quality art education. The website demonstrates a professional design with good content relevance and user experience, supported by strong trust signals such as media mentions and testimonials. Technically, the site employs a modern JavaScript stack with integrations for analytics, marketing, and video playback, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS services. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data, but lacks some security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and absence of consent mechanisms. Overall, the domain registration data supports legitimacy and business maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching londonartstudies.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates a subscription-based model offering online art history classes with tiered access options. It maintains a sister site for younger audiences, indicating market segmentation. The company leverages social media and third-party marketing tools to engage and grow its user base. Media coverage from reputable outlets enhances brand credibility. The absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies suggests an area for compliance improvement. The technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from enhanced security configurations. The company appears to be a small-sized education provider with a focused niche and consistent branding.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS, which provide a solid foundation for secure communications. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were detected in the HTML content. The site uses secure forms and modern libraries but should implement DNSSEC and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy to improve security transparency. Privacy compliance gaps, especially regarding cookie consent and privacy policy publication, present regulatory risks. Incident response and security contact information are not publicly available, limiting readiness for security events.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  4. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Provide clear security incident contact channels and consider appointing a Data Protection Officer or privacy contact.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
London Art Studies
Description
Award-winning online art history classes offering video lectures and curated content for art lovers, focusing on art education and appreciation.
Key services
Online art history video classes, Membership access to curated art content, Free handpicked videos, Newsletter subscription
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Slick Carousel, Selectric, AjaxChimp, Less.js, Vimeo Player API, Stripe.js, js-cookie, Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics, Hotjar
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS and nameservers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with AJAX submission

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Google Ads (AW-676503675), Hotjar
Marketing tools
Mailchimp (via AjaxChimp), Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website offers a niche educational service in online art history classes.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Uses multiple third-party tracking and marketing tools without visible consent mechanism.
  4. Good media and testimonial trust signals enhance credibility.
  5. Technical stack is modern but lacks some security headers and DNSSEC.
  6. Domain registration is stable and consistent with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom or unknown CMS with a modern front-end stack including jQuery, Slick Carousel, Selectric, and Vimeo Player API. It integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Mailchimp. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS and nameservers, providing performance and security benefits. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility. The absence of some security headers and DNSSEC indicates technical debt in security hardening. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business model but requires enhancements for compliance and security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with londonartstudies.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review londonartstudies.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.