Skip to main content

Security report for logrocket.io

LogRocket · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LogRocket is a technology company specializing in session replay, product analytics, and error tracking services aimed at software developers and product teams. Founded in 2014, it offers SaaS solutions to help businesses understand user problems and improve software quality. The company positions itself as an established player in the product analytics market with a medium-sized business profile. The website demonstrates a modern technical infrastructure using React and Next.js frameworks, hosted with Cloudflare DNS and leveraging third-party analytics and authentication services such as Segment and Auth0. The site is well-optimized for performance and mobile devices, with good SEO and accessibility basics. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and assumed security headers, though explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly found. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business history and legitimacy, showing a consistent and trustworthy profile.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching logrocket.io

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
50
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LogRocket operates in the technology sector, targeting software development teams with tools for session replay, analytics, and error tracking. Its SaaS business model focuses on providing actionable insights to improve user experience and software quality. The company leverages partnerships with analytics and marketing platforms, including LinkedIn Ads and Segment, to enhance its market reach. The website content and branding are professional and consistent, supporting a strong market presence. No subsidiaries or parent companies are identified. The company appears to maintain a medium-sized operation with a focus on innovation and customer-centric product development.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and likely employs standard security headers, contributing to a good security baseline. Use of Auth0 for authentication indicates a mature approach to identity management. However, the lack of publicly available security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure information suggests gaps in transparency and readiness communication. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The security score is good but could be improved by publishing explicit security and incident response documentation and enabling DNSSEC.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add explicit security policy and incident response information accessible to users.
  3. Enable DNSSEC to enhance domain security.
  4. Provide verified company contact information including emails and phone numbers.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts to minimize tracking and improve privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LogRocket
Description
LogRocket helps you understand problems affecting your users, so that you can get back to building great software.
Key services
Session Replay, Product Analytics, Error Tracking
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (Next.js), Cloudflare DNS, Auth0 (authentication), Segment Analytics, Google Fonts, Various JavaScript libraries
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers (assumed)
  • Use of Auth0 for authentication

Analytics and tracking

Services
Segment Analytics, LogRocket Analytics, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
LinkedIn Ads
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, Segment Analytics, LogRocket Analytics
Marketing tools
Segment, LogRocket Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in provided HTML snippet.
  3. Multiple external analytics and marketing scripts detected.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML snippet.
  5. Strong branding and professional design observed.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  7. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and business age.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern React-based framework (Next.js) with server-side rendering and optimized asset loading. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS, enhancing performance and security. The site loads multiple external scripts for analytics, marketing, and authentication, indicating a complex but well-integrated tech stack. Performance is fast with good mobile optimization. Accessibility is basic but present. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which may introduce privacy concerns and potential vulnerabilities if not managed carefully.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with logrocket.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review logrocket.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.