Skip to main content

Security report for logotoria.lv

Logotoria · Education · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Logotoria is a small educational business based in Riga, Latvia, specializing in child development and speech therapy services for young children starting from 1 year old. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact information and multiple physical locations. The business targets parents seeking developmental and speech therapy support for their children. Technically, the website is built on the Tilda platform, leveraging standard web technologies including jQuery and modern tracking tools like Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. While the site is mobile optimized and well-structured, it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which impacts its privacy compliance score. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage but missing advanced security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the website is safe, professional, and suitable for its target audience but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching logotoria.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the education sector, focusing on specialized speech therapy and developmental classes for children in Riga. Its business model is service-oriented, relying on in-person sessions at three local branches. The website indicates a localized market position with no evidence of subsidiaries or parent companies. The use of multiple language options (Latvian and Russian) suggests an inclusive approach to the local demographic. The presence of contact details and physical addresses supports credibility. The business appears to be small-sized with a niche focus, leveraging digital presence primarily for information and contact facilitation rather than e-commerce or large-scale operations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and no obvious vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security posture. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which is a gap in security culture and readiness. Tracking technologies are present, but privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies and consent mechanisms. The lack of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification. Overall, the site is not high risk but would benefit from implementing recommended security best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and make it easily accessible on the website.
  2. Add a cookie policy with a consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  4. Publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  5. Verify and monitor WHOIS data availability to ensure domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Logotoria
Description
Nodarbības ar logopēdu bērniem no 2.5 gadiem. Attīstoša nodarbība bērniem no 1 līdz 3 gadiem. Logoritmikas grupas nodarbība. Sagatavošana skolai. 3 filiāles Rīgā: Baldones iela 7, Braslas iela 29, Pulkveža Brieža 31a
Key services
Speech therapy sessions for children from 2.5 years, Developmental classes for children aged 1 to 3 years, Logoritmikas group classes, School preparation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.10.2, Tilda platform scripts, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
Tilda CMS
Platforms
Tilda website builder
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL and external scripts loaded over HTTPS)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Tilda platform with standard scripts and CDN hosting.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page.
  4. Contact information including phone, email, and physical addresses are clearly provided.
  5. Website content is in Latvian with some Russian language options.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  7. Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel are used for tracking.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Tilda CMS platform, utilizing jQuery 1.10.2 and various Tilda-specific scripts for animations, forms, and UI components. Hosting is via Tilda's CDN infrastructure, ensuring reasonable performance and availability. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data for social sharing. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The use of Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel indicates moderate user tracking. No critical technical issues or broken elements were detected in the provided HTML content. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack by updating jQuery and enhancing accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with logotoria.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review logotoria.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.