Skip to main content

Security report for logopond.com

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Logopond.com is an established online platform founded in 2006 that serves as a community and showcase for logo, brand, and identity design inspiration. It targets graphic designers and branding professionals seeking creative ideas and portfolio exposure. The website demonstrates a consistent and professional design with good user experience and relevant content for its niche audience. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies including FontAwesome icons and Cloudflare DNS services, but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which could be improved to enhance security posture. Privacy and cookie policies are not detected, indicating a gap in compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No contact information or incident response channels are found, limiting direct communication avenues for users or security reporting. Overall, the domain registration data supports legitimacy and long-term operation, but security and privacy practices require strengthening to meet modern standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: 70.32.97.111

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching logopond.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Logopond operates in the technology sector as a niche platform for design inspiration, focusing on logos and branding. Its business model revolves around community engagement and portfolio showcasing rather than direct sales. The platform likely generates revenue through advertising or premium features, although no explicit monetization details are found. The target audience includes designers and creative agencies, positioning Logopond as a specialized resource in the competitive design inspiration market. The absence of detailed business information and contact data suggests a small-sized operation with limited public corporate disclosures. The platform benefits from a stable domain age and consistent branding, which supports user trust and market presence.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS but lacks DNSSEC and visible security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries are detected in the provided content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response contacts, indicates compliance and security governance gaps. The site does not appear to use extensive tracking or analytics, which reduces privacy risks but also limits data-driven security insights. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended best practices and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to secure DNS queries and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms.
  3. Add security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Publish contact information including security incident response emails (e.g., security@ or abuse@).
  5. Conduct regular security audits to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Logopond is a platform showcasing logo, brand, and identity design inspiration, serving as a community and gallery for designers.
Key services
logo showcase, branding inspiration, designer community engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
FontAwesome, Cloudflare DNS, JavaScript, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Pinterest
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML content.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the HTML content.
  4. Uses FontAwesome for icons and Cloudflare for DNS services.
  5. No security headers detected in the provided data; DNSSEC is not enabled.
  6. Website content is focused on design inspiration and community showcase.
  7. No evidence of adult or NSFW content.
  8. Minimal tracking detected (Pinterest scripts).
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern icon library (FontAwesome) and is hosted with DNS services from Cloudflare, indicating a reliable infrastructure. The HTML content is well-structured with responsive meta tags for mobile optimization. However, no CMS or advanced frameworks are detected, suggesting a custom or lightweight platform. Performance is moderate based on included scripts and stylesheets. SEO optimization is basic with a descriptive title but no visible Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data in the provided snippet. Accessibility features are minimal but present. Technical debt appears low, but modernization opportunities include adding structured data, improving security headers, and enhancing privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with logopond.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review logopond.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.