Skip to main content

Security report for logo.wine

Logo.wine · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Logo.wine is a niche online platform providing free downloadable brand logos in SVG vector and PNG file formats. The website targets a general audience including designers, marketers, and businesses seeking brand logos for various uses. The business model is based on offering free access to a curated collection of logos, positioning itself as a convenient resource in the digital branding space. The site demonstrates consistent branding and good content quality, supporting its market position as a specialized logo repository. Technically, the website employs modern web standards including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with Google Fonts integration and JSON-LD structured data for SEO enhancement. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation clarity and moderate performance. However, no CMS or hosting provider details are evident from the content. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security headers. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with excellent SSL configuration, but lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, and no cookie consent mechanism is present, which may impact GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with standard best practices. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected, which is common for small online services. The website content is professional and consistent with the domain purpose, indicating legitimacy. No suspicious patterns or phishing indicators were found. The overall risk is low, but improvements in privacy compliance and security policies are recommended to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching logo.wine

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Logo.wine operates in the Technology sector as a small-sized entity focused on providing free brand logos to a global audience. Its competitive advantage lies in the free availability of high-quality vector and raster logo files, catering to designers and businesses. The business model is content-driven, relying on web traffic and possibly indirect monetization strategies such as advertising or affiliate links, though none are evident in the HTML content. The target customer segments include graphic designers, marketing professionals, and small businesses. Growth indicators are not directly visible, and no parent or subsidiary relationships are disclosed. The partnership ecosystem is minimal with no partner domains identified. Strategic observations suggest focusing on enhancing privacy compliance and security transparency to build greater user trust and expand market reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the absence of key security headers and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate gaps in security best practices. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure mechanisms or security.txt files, limiting transparency for security researchers. GDPR compliance is partial due to missing cookie consent mechanisms. The site does not collect sensitive user data via forms, reducing risk exposure. Overall, the security culture appears basic, with room for improvement in formalizing policies and implementing technical controls to enhance protection and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance trust and facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  4. Create and host a security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure guidelines.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Logo.wine
Description
Logo.wine is an online collection of the brand logos from around the world, which can be downloaded for free in SVG vector or PNG file format.
Key services
Free logo downloads, SVG vector and PNG file formats
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts (Lato), JSON-LD structured data
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected, limiting domain ownership insights.
  3. Site offers free downloadable brand logos in SVG and PNG formats.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via form only.
  5. No cookie consent mechanism detected, potential GDPR compliance gap.
  6. No explicit security policies or incident response information published.
  7. No advertising or tracking scripts detected in HTML content.
  8. Good use of structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and branding.
  9. Mobile responsive design and good navigation structure observed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a clean and modern technical stack with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, leveraging Google Fonts for typography and JSON-LD for structured data. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation and user experience. Performance is moderate, with no heavy scripts or third-party trackers detected. There is no indication of a CMS or specific hosting provider from the HTML content. The absence of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms represents technical debt that should be addressed. Overall, the infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from modernization in security and privacy features to reduce risks and improve compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with logo.wine. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review logo.wine.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.