Skip to main content

Security report for logilab.fr

Logilab · Technology · France

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Logilab is a French technology company specializing in software development, consulting, and training with a focus on semantic web technologies and scientific computing. The company targets engineers, researchers, and technical professionals, offering high-level expertise and agile methodologies. Their market position is niche but well-defined, serving institutions and research labs with innovative web 3.0 applications and open source software solutions. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings and active content updates. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript technologies, including React components and Matomo analytics for privacy-conscious user tracking. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, though some improvements in security headers and explicit privacy documentation are recommended. The hosting and CMS details are not explicitly identified, but performance is moderate with good user experience. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of explicit security headers, privacy and cookie policies, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in compliance and security posture. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly impacts trust but does not detract significantly from the overall legitimacy given the professional web presence. Overall, Logilab's website is a well-maintained, professional platform that effectively communicates its business and technical expertise. Strategic recommendations include enhancing privacy compliance, publishing security policies, and improving security headers to strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching logilab.fr

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Logilab operates in a specialized technology niche focusing on semantic web and scientific computing software solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in their open source preference, agile methodologies, and deep domain expertise. Revenue streams likely include software development contracts, consulting engagements, and training programs. The target customer segments are technical professionals, research institutions, and cultural organizations. Growth indicators include active blog updates and participation in industry events. The partnership ecosystem includes related domains for training and semantic web communities, reinforcing their market presence. Operationally, the company maintains a consistent brand and digital footprint, though WHOIS data gaps suggest a need for improved domain registration transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with mandatory HTTPS and no visible sensitive data leaks. The use of Matomo analytics suggests a privacy-aware approach to user tracking. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of published privacy and cookie policies indicate compliance gaps, particularly regarding GDPR and NIS2 frameworks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder timely security issue reporting. Overall, the security culture appears basic but functional, with opportunities to enhance trust and regulatory compliance through documented policies and improved technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Improve WHOIS domain registration transparency to increase trustworthiness and legitimacy perception.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to avoid potential vulnerabilities and maintain a strong security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Logilab
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Logilab
Description
Logilab est une société spécialisée dans le développement de logiciels, le conseil, et la formation en web sémantique et informatique scientifique.
Key services
Software development, Consulting, Training in web semantic and scientific computing
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Matomo Analytics, React (implied by react-loading-skeleton CSS), JSON-LD structured data
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in French language
  2. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found on homepage or footer
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address
  4. Use of Matomo analytics indicates privacy-conscious tracking
  5. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy
  6. No explicit security headers detected in provided data
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to AFNIC server response or domain registration status
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack with React components and Matomo analytics for tracking. The CSS includes advanced animations and responsive design features, indicating attention to user experience and accessibility. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly identified. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous script loading and efficient resource usage. Technical risks include missing security headers and incomplete privacy documentation, which could affect compliance and security ratings. Overall, the infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with logilab.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review logilab.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.