Skip to main content

Security report for logical-office.com

Logical Office Ltd · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Logical Office Ltd operates a specialized CRM platform targeting small businesses and accounting professionals, offering integrated client dashboards, email and job management, and automation features. The company has a well-established market presence since 2004, positioning itself as a niche provider focused on productivity enhancement through software integration. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service descriptions and accessible contact information. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and frameworks, hosted by OVH sas, and demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security measures include HTTPS and domain status protections, though improvements such as DNSSEC and security headers are recommended. Privacy and cookie policies are present but basic, with no explicit incident response or security policy disclosed. Overall, the website is trustworthy and business-focused, with moderate tracking via Lead Forensics. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security configurations, publishing comprehensive security policies, and improving privacy compliance transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching logical-office.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
27
Security headers
40
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Logical Office Ltd leverages a SaaS business model providing CRM solutions tailored for small businesses and accountants. Their competitive advantage lies in deep integration with accounting software (XERO, SAGE, QuickBooks) and automation of client communications and deadlines. Revenue streams are subscription-based with add-ons for document signing, AML checks, and messaging. The target market is small to medium enterprises seeking productivity tools. The company maintains partnerships with service providers like Docu-Crypt and MyDocSafe, enhancing their product ecosystem. Growth indicators include continuous product updates and training materials. The company operates independently with no parent or subsidiaries identified. The website content and structure support a professional and credible market position.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain status protections that prevent unauthorized transfers or deletions. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS reduces the overall security posture. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the source. The use of encryption (AES256) for client file transfers is a strong security feature. Lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and readiness perception. Compliance with GDPR is implied but not explicitly documented. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could benefit from enhanced technical controls and policy disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by providing detailed GDPR information and cookie consent management.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
Logical Office Ltd
Registration number
03157537
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Logical Office Ltd
Description
CRM for small businesss
Key services
Client dashboard, Email management, Accounts integration (XERO, SAGE, QuickBooks), Work and job management, Automation of deadlines and reminders, Document encryption and secure file transfer, Add-ons like document signing, text messaging, AML reports
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Fonts, Yoast SEO, Slider Revolution, Contact Form 7, Form Maker plugin, RevSlider, Lead Forensics tracking
Frameworks
WPBakery Page Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited
  • Use of encryption for file transfer (AES256 mentioned)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Lead Forensics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Lead Forensics
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Lead Forensics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based CRM software provider for small businesses.
  2. Content is professional and well-structured with clear product features and contact info.
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  4. Security posture is decent but could be improved with DNSSEC and security headers.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present but basic.
  6. No incident response or security policy publicly disclosed.
  7. Use of third-party integrations and tracking (Lead Forensics).
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using WPBakery Page Builder and several plugins including Contact Form 7, Slider Revolution, and Form Maker. The tech stack includes jQuery and Google Fonts, with hosting provided by OVH sas. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). The site uses Lead Forensics for visitor tracking. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers. The site is well-maintained but could benefit from modernization of security practices and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with logical-office.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review logical-office.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.