Skip to main content

Security report for lm.lt

LITNET KTU techninis centras · Education · Lithuania

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website lm.lt represents LITNET KTU techninis centras, a Lithuanian educational network service provider offering internet and related IT services to educational institutions. The site is professionally designed using Joomla CMS and modern frontend technologies, targeting Lithuanian schools and educational organizations. It provides a range of services including internet connectivity, wireless networks, domain registration, email services, web hosting, and training. The site is well-structured with clear navigation and multiple service portals linked externally. Technically, the site uses Joomla with Bootstrap, Font Awesome, and jQuery libraries, ensuring a responsive and accessible user experience. The presence of cookie consent and email obfuscation indicates attention to privacy and security best practices. However, no explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which could be improved. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The lack of security headers and incident response information are areas for enhancement. Privacy compliance is addressed with cookie policies and GDPR indicators. Business credibility is strong with clear contact information and consistent branding. Overall, the website is a trustworthy and functional portal for Lithuanian educational network services, with moderate technical sophistication and good privacy awareness. Strategic improvements in security policy transparency and accessibility would further strengthen its posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lm.lt

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention lm.lt, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
12,916
Employees
19
Customers
12,572
Third parties
325
Weak passwords
9%

Latest record dated 2026-05-25 · 413 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for lm.lt.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –epaslaugos.lm.lt2026-05-25
  • –zidinio.vma.lm.lt2026-05-20
  • –pastas.lm.lt2026-05-16
  • –pastas.lm.lt2026-05-15
  • –epaslaugos.lm.lt2026-05-13

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LITNET KTU techninis centras operates as a key national provider of internet and IT services for educational institutions in Lithuania. Its business model focuses on providing free and paid internet connectivity, domain registration, email, and hosting services tailored to schools and universities. The organization leverages partnerships with service providers and maintains a network ecosystem supporting over 890 educational institutions and 159,220 registered users. The website reflects a stable market position with a focus on education and technology sectors. Growth indicators include recent service updates and training offerings. The partnership ecosystem includes eduRoam and national regulatory bodies. The company targets institutional clients, emphasizing service reliability and compliance with Lithuanian laws.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and email obfuscation to reduce spam risks. Cookie consent mechanisms align with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, and security.txt files indicates gaps in transparency and readiness for incident handling. No security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were found. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and improving header configurations. Compliance with GDPR is evident but could be better documented.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information, including security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards and improve user experience for disabled users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LITNET KTU techninis centras
Description
Lietuvos mokslo ir studijų institucijų kompiuterių tinklas LITNET jungia mokslo, studijų ir švietimo institucijų kompiuterių tinklus. Prie šio tinklo prijungtoms institucijoms teikiamos duomenų perdavimo paslaugos, diegiami inovatyvūs kompiuterių tinklo ir paslaugų sprendimai.
Key services
Internetinis ryšys, Belaidis tinklas, Vardų registracija, Elektroninis paštas, Tinklalapių priegloba, Mokymai, VPN, Turinio filtravimas
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Joomla!, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, jQuery, SP Page Builder, JCEMediaBox
Frameworks
Helix3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Email addresses obfuscated with JavaScript cloaking
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Lithuanian targeting educational institutions.
  3. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits; no registrar or dates extracted.
  4. Site uses Joomla CMS with modern frontend libraries.
  5. Cookie consent banner is implemented indicating GDPR awareness.
  6. Contact information is clearly provided with official emails and phone numbers.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  9. No advertising or affiliate programs detected.
  10. Site provides multiple service portals with external links.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Joomla CMS with Helix3 framework and uses Bootstrap and Font Awesome for styling and icons. JavaScript libraries include jQuery and plugins for media boxes and page building. The site is mobile responsive and uses modern CSS and JS assets. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. The site lacks advanced analytics or tracking scripts, indicating a privacy-conscious approach. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to modernize security headers and improve accessibility compliance. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively with room for security and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lm.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lm.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.