Skip to main content

Security report for liveto.io

Liveto · Technology · Finland

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Liveto is a Finnish technology company specializing in comprehensive event management solutions including ticketing, access control, POS systems, and event applications. Established in 2017, Liveto serves event organizers primarily in Finland with a SaaS platform that integrates multiple event-related services. The website is built on HubSpot CMS and incorporates modern marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Hotjar, demonstrating a mature digital infrastructure. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot, indicating attention to privacy compliance, although explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages were not detected in the provided content. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enabled and domain registration protected by privacy services, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for enhanced protection. Overall, Liveto presents a professional and trustworthy online presence with room for improvement in explicit privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching liveto.io

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
45
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention liveto.io, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
49
Employees
0
Customers
49
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
6%

4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for liveto.io.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Liveto operates in the technology sector, focusing on event management SaaS solutions. Its business model revolves around providing integrated tools for event planning, ticket sales, access control, and event applications, targeting event organizers and businesses in Finland. The company leverages partnerships with major marketing and analytics platforms to optimize customer engagement and data insights. The domain age and registration details align with a medium-sized enterprise with a stable market presence. The absence of detailed contact emails and physical addresses on the website suggests a focus on digital-first customer interactions. The company maintains consistent branding and uses structured data to enhance search visibility. No suspicious domains or partners were identified, indicating a clean partnership ecosystem.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses reputable third-party services for analytics and marketing, which are standard security practices. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents potential areas for security enhancement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. Cookie consent is actively managed, supporting GDPR compliance. Overall, the security posture is moderate to good but could benefit from additional hardening and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  2. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service on the website.
  3. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance trust and compliance.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Liveto
Description
Liveto tarjoaa tapahtumien hallinnan, lipunmyynnin, kassajärjestelmän, pääsynhallinnan ja tapahtumasovelluksen yhdessä alustassa.
Key services
Tapahtumien hallinta, Lipunmyynti, Kulunvalvonta, Kassajärjestelmä, Tapahtumasovellus, Webinaarialusta
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HubSpot CMS, jQuery 1.11.2, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Intercom, Hotjar, Cookiebot
Platforms
HubSpot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Intercom, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Uses modern marketing and analytics tools with cookie consent.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in provided content.
  4. Contact information limited to phone number in structured data; no email or physical address found.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  6. Good technical implementation with HubSpot CMS and multiple tracking integrations.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. Domain WHOIS privacy protection used but justified.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on HubSpot CMS, utilizing jQuery 1.11.2 and multiple marketing and analytics integrations including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hotjar, and Intercom. The site uses asynchronous loading for scripts and stylesheets to optimize performance. Mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization are well addressed with appropriate meta tags and alternate language links. Hosting is managed via Cloudflare DNS and NameCheap registrar, with HTTPS enforced. The site shows moderate performance and basic accessibility features. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries, but jQuery 1.11.2 is an older version and may warrant updating. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well maintained with opportunities for further optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with liveto.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review liveto.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.