Skip to main content

Security report for liveramp.uk

LiveRamp · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LiveRamp UK operates as a regional branch of LiveRamp, providing an advanced data collaboration platform that enables enterprise marketers and partners to connect people, data, and devices across digital and physical channels. The company holds a strong market position with over 900 global customers, including Fortune 500 companies, and offers a comprehensive suite of services such as consumer data strategy, enterprise identity, marketing impact, and clean room analytics. The website reflects a mature digital presence with rich content, professional design, and clear navigation tailored to enterprise clients and marketing professionals. Technically, the site is built on WordPress and leverages modern marketing and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, Wistia video embeds, and a privacy manager from Ketch. Hosting is inferred to be on AWS infrastructure. However, the site suffers from a critical security flaw: the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, which severely impacts its security posture and trustworthiness. Performance is also suboptimal with a slow page load time and a large page size, though mobile optimization and SEO practices are well implemented. Security-wise, the lack of HTTPS and security headers exposes the site to risks and undermines user trust. Privacy compliance is strong, with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms in place. Contact information is available, but no explicit security or incident response policies are found. Overall, the site demonstrates strong business credibility and content quality but requires urgent security improvements to meet enterprise standards.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of liveramp.uk. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching liveramp.uk

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
85
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LiveRamp UK targets enterprise marketers and data professionals seeking to unify and leverage customer data for enhanced marketing impact and analytics. The company’s competitive advantage lies in its interoperable platform that supports data collaboration across clouds, walled gardens, and media platforms, backed by a large partner ecosystem including major media and advertising companies. Revenue streams likely include SaaS subscriptions, data services, and consulting. The presence of detailed case studies and a broad solution portfolio indicates a mature go-to-market strategy focused on large enterprises. The company maintains a consistent brand and strong trust signals through customer logos and social media presence. Regional domains and localized content support global market penetration.

Security posture

The current security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS, which is a critical vulnerability for any enterprise-facing website. No security headers such as HSTS or Content-Security-Policy are implemented, and no OCSP stapling or session resumption mechanisms are enabled. While no known vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or POODLE are detected, the lack of encryption exposes data in transit to interception and undermines user trust. Privacy policies and consent mechanisms are well established, indicating compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and security policy disclosures are absent, suggesting room for improvement in transparency and readiness. Overall, the site requires immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues and enhancement of security best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Urgently install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Implement security headers including HSTS, Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Enable OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve security and performance.
  4. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any other vulnerabilities or outdated libraries.
  5. Publish clear security policies and incident response procedures to enhance transparency and trust.
  6. Optimize website performance to reduce load times and improve user experience.
  7. Maintain and regularly update privacy and cookie policies to ensure ongoing compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, GSAP for animations, and Wistia for video hosting. SEO is enhanced using Yoast SEO Premium, and Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tags. Hosting is on AWS as indicated by DNS nameservers. Despite a rich content structure and good mobile optimization, the site suffers from slow load times and a large number of resources (334) contributing to a page size over 1MB. The absence of HTTPS is a major technical risk. The site uses a privacy manager script from Ketch, indicating attention to privacy compliance. Overall, the infrastructure is modern but requires security and performance improvements to align with enterprise standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 70/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with liveramp.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review liveramp.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.