Skip to main content

Security report for liveagent.com

Quality Unit s.r.o. · Technology · Slovakia

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Email security.

Security score

88/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LiveAgent, operated by Quality Unit s.r.o., is a well-established SaaS provider specializing in customer support software including help desk, live chat, and call center solutions. The company targets businesses globally seeking to improve customer service efficiency and engagement. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and comprehensive content that supports their market positioning as a reliable technology provider in the customer support industry. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor, leveraging modern analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Visual Website Optimizer, and reCAPTCHA for security. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, with good SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and Content Security Policy in place, though additional security headers could enhance protection. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, reflecting attention to regulatory requirements. However, the absence of WHOIS data for the domain introduces a minor trust concern, though the overall business credibility remains high based on website content and branding. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security.txt file, and providing explicit incident response contacts to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching liveagent.com

This scan found 11 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
75
Email security
75
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
88

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention liveagent.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
27
Employees
0
Customers
26
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
7%

5 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for liveagent.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LiveAgent operates in the competitive customer support software market with a SaaS subscription model. Their key services include help desk ticketing, live chat, and call center software, targeting SMEs and larger enterprises worldwide. The company benefits from a consistent brand presence and positive trust signals such as customer testimonials and industry awards. Their marketing ecosystem integrates multiple advertising and analytics platforms, indicating a data-driven approach to customer acquisition and retention. The business is headquartered in Slovakia and founded in 2007, suggesting a stable operational history. While WHOIS data is missing, the website's professional quality and comprehensive policies support legitimacy. The company could explore expanding transparency around security and incident response to enhance competitive advantage.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS and a Content Security Policy. Use of reCAPTCHA on forms helps mitigate automated abuse. However, the absence of additional security headers like Strict-Transport-Security and X-Frame-Options represents an opportunity for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published security.txt file and incident response contact information limits transparency for security researchers and customers. Overall, the security posture is mature but could be enhanced by adopting best practices for headers and vulnerability disclosure. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy and cookie policies, supporting data protection obligations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement additional security headers such as Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response contacts.
  3. Add explicit incident response and abuse contact information on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance WHOIS transparency or provide domain registration details publicly to improve business credibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Quality Unit s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Quality Unit s.r.o.
Description
LiveAgent is a customer service software offering help desk, live chat, and call center solutions to businesses worldwide.
Key services
Help Desk Software, Live Chat, Call Center Software, Ticketing System
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), Elementor, FontAwesome, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Elementor (WordPress page builder)
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, QualityUnit Analytics, Visual Website Optimizer, Dreamdata
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, LinkedIn Ads, Reddit Ads
Tracking pixels
Visual Website Optimizer, QualityUnit Analytics, Dreamdata
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Flowdunt API
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is business-focused, professional, and comprehensive.
  3. Strong use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  4. Security headers partially implemented; room for improvement.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, which is a minor trust concern.
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  7. No adult or questionable content detected.
  8. Multiple external trusted domains linked for analytics and advertising.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Elementor page builder, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and fonts such as FontAwesome. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Visual Website Optimizer, and Dreamdata, indicating a sophisticated digital marketing infrastructure. The site uses HTTPS with a Content Security Policy to protect content integrity. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and hreflang attributes for internationalization. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The technical stack is modern and well maintained, though there is room for improvement in security headers and potential performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 87/100Low18 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with liveagent.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review liveagent.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.