Skip to main content

Security report for litran.com

Litran · Technology · N/a

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Litran is a small technology platform specializing in artificial intelligence solutions, primarily offering an AI chatbot service and educational content related to AI and prompts. The website is designed with a clean, user-friendly interface and provides interactive chatbot functionality powered by custom JavaScript. The platform targets a general audience interested in AI technologies and chatbot interactions. Hosting is provided via Freehostia, indicating a modest infrastructure setup suitable for a small business. From a security perspective, the website shows basic protective measures such as clientTransferProhibited domain status and a cookie consent mechanism. However, it lacks advanced security headers, DNSSEC, and explicit HTTPS enforcement details, which are areas for improvement. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookie policy present but no comprehensive GDPR-aligned privacy policy or terms of service. Contact information is limited to a support email address, with no phone numbers or physical addresses provided. Overall, the website demonstrates a moderate level of technical maturity and business credibility for a niche AI service provider. The absence of advanced security features and comprehensive compliance documentation suggests room for enhancement to meet higher standards of security and privacy. The domain age and registration data support the legitimacy of the business, with no suspicious indicators detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching litran.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Litran operates in the AI technology sector, focusing on chatbot services and AI educational content. The business model appears to be service-oriented, providing AI solutions and interactive chatbot experiences to a general audience. The company has maintained its domain since 2012, indicating stability and ongoing operations. Its market position is niche, targeting users interested in AI and chatbot technologies. The presence of social media links suggests efforts to engage with a broader community, although no direct partnerships or subsidiaries are evident. Revenue streams likely derive from AI solution offerings and possibly educational content or consulting. The company maintains a modest digital footprint with basic hosting and minimal tracking or advertising, reflecting a lean operational approach.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate but with notable gaps. The domain is protected against unauthorized transfers via clientTransferProhibited status, but DNSSEC is not enabled, leaving DNS queries vulnerable to spoofing. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security were detected, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. The absence of HTTPS enforcement details raises concerns about secure data transmission, especially for user inputs in the chatbot. Privacy compliance is minimal, with a basic cookie consent banner but no detailed privacy or security policies. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not present, limiting transparency and preparedness. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities were found, the site would benefit from enhanced security controls and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to secure DNS queries and prevent spoofing attacks.
  2. Implement HTTPS with strong TLS configuration and enforce HTTPS site-wide.
  3. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and security policies aligned with GDPR requirements.
  5. Establish clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure contacts and procedures.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Litran
Description
Litran is a platform specialized in artificial intelligence offering AI solutions and chatbots.
Key services
AI solutions, Chatbots, AI educational content
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • clientTransferProhibited domain status
  • cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small AI chatbot platform with educational content.
  2. No advanced security headers or HTTPS enforcement detected in provided data.
  3. Cookie consent banner present but privacy policy is basic and not fully GDPR compliant.
  4. No contact phone numbers or physical addresses found; only support email available.
  5. No terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  6. No analytics or advertising scripts detected, indicating minimal tracking.
  7. Site uses custom JavaScript for chatbot interaction without external libraries.
  8. Hosting via Freehostia with DNS nameservers indicating shared hosting.
  9. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
  10. Content is in Spanish with some English and French chatbot responses.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with standard HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript without reliance on external frameworks or CMS platforms. The chatbot functionality is custom-coded with client-side JavaScript handling user interaction and responses. Hosting is provided by Freehostia, a shared hosting provider, which may limit scalability and performance optimization. The site shows basic mobile responsiveness and accessibility but lacks advanced SEO and performance optimizations. No analytics or third-party tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal data collection. The technical setup is sufficient for a small-scale informational and interactive site but could be modernized with improved security, performance, and compliance features to support growth and trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with litran.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review litran.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.