Skip to main content

Security report for lilokids.lv

LILO KIDS · Education · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LILO KIDS is an early childhood development center based in Riga, Latvia, specializing in aquatic therapy and comprehensive developmental programs for children aged 0 to 3 years. The center offers a multifunctional approach combining physiotherapy, audiologopedics, and early general development, supported by a team of highly qualified specialists with over 20 years of experience. The website presents a professional and user-friendly interface built on the Tilda CMS platform, featuring clear navigation and mobile optimization. However, the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies indicates gaps in compliance with modern data protection standards. Security posture is moderate, with HTTPS usage implied but lacking visible security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-positioned in its niche but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lilokids.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the education and healthcare sectors, targeting parents of infants and toddlers in Latvia. Its unique market position as the only diagnostic center in Riga focusing on infant aquatic therapy and early development provides a competitive advantage. The business model is service-oriented, offering specialized developmental programs and postpartum recovery services. The website's content quality and branding are consistent, supporting a credible market presence. The use of Google Tag Manager indicates engagement in digital marketing and analytics, though privacy compliance needs improvement. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data. Growth potential exists through expanded online presence and enhanced compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture with HTTPS usage and no visible exposed sensitive data. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No security policy or incident response information is provided, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is found. The absence of privacy and cookie policies further exposes compliance risks, especially under GDPR. The site uses third-party scripts including Google Tag Manager, which requires careful management to avoid privacy leaks. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a small service business but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve security posture.
  3. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident reporting.
  4. Verify and monitor WHOIS data availability to ensure domain registration transparency and trust.
  5. Enhance user consent mechanisms for tracking and analytics to improve privacy compliance and user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LILO KIDS
Description
Centrs LILO kids nodrošina daudzfunkcionālu pieeju, plašu pakalpojumu klāstu maziem bērniem no 0-3 gadu vecuma, kā arī nodarbības vecākiem. Vienīgais diagnostikas centrs Rīgā zīdaiņu agrīnai attīstībai ūdenī. Augsti kvalificētu speciālistu komanda ar vairāk nekā 20 gadu pieredzi. Programmas ietver fizioterapiju, audiologopēdiju un agrīnu vispārējo attīstību.
Key services
early childhood aquatic therapy, physiotherapy, audiologopedics, early general development, postpartum recovery for mothers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery 1.10.2, Google Tag Manager, Tilda CMS, Google Fonts (Inter), YouTube embedded video
Frameworks
Tilda Blocks
Platforms
Tilda
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL https://lilokids.lv)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to early childhood development.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found on the homepage or metadata.
  4. Contact information is clearly displayed with phone number and physical address in Riga, Latvia.
  5. Website uses Tilda CMS and associated CDN and scripts.
  6. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking.
  7. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  8. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; domain legitimacy partially unverifiable.
  9. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure or security policy pages.
  10. No email addresses found in the visible content or metadata.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Tilda CMS platform, leveraging its grid and block system for responsive design. It uses jQuery 1.10.2 and multiple Tilda JavaScript libraries for animations, forms, and lazy loading. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and marketing tracking. The site loads fonts from Google Fonts and hosts images and assets on Tilda's CDN. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical risks include reliance on older jQuery version and absence of advanced security headers. Modernization opportunities include updating libraries, enhancing accessibility, and implementing stronger security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lilokids.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lilokids.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.