Skip to main content

Security report for liana.fi

Liana Technologies Oy · Technology · Finland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Liana Technologies Oy is a Finnish technology company specializing in digital marketing and communication tools under the Liana®Cloud product family. The company targets marketing and communication teams, offering SaaS solutions such as marketing automation, email marketing, webinar hosting, and analytics. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with a focus on digital marketing efficiency. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap, Matomo analytics, and integrates third-party services like Stripe for payments and Pipedrive for chatbot functionality. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, cookie consent implemented, and privacy-respecting analytics in use. However, explicit privacy policies and terms of service pages were not found in the provided content, indicating room for improvement in compliance transparency. Overall, the website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and trustworthy, with a moderate to high security maturity level.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching liana.fi

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
45
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention liana.fi, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for liana.fi right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Liana Technologies holds a solid position in the Finnish digital marketing technology sector, leveraging SaaS delivery models to serve marketing and communication professionals. Their integration with reputable partners like Stripe and Pipedrive enhances their service ecosystem. The business model focuses on subscription-based digital tools, with growth potential in expanding marketing automation and analytics capabilities. The website's content and structure support clear communication of services, though direct contact information is limited in the analyzed content. The company demonstrates a mature digital presence with strategic partnerships and a focus on user privacy and consent management.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of cookie consent mechanisms that comply with GDPR principles. Integration of Google reCAPTCHA and Matomo analytics indicates attention to bot mitigation and privacy-respecting data collection. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure information suggests gaps in transparency and readiness. Security headers beyond HTTPS are not explicitly detected, and no vulnerabilities were found in the provided content. The company should consider publishing detailed security and incident response policies to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the homepage.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure information including contact channels.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards for inclusive design.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate supply chain risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Liana Technologies Oy
Description
Liana®Cloud product family offers efficient and easy-to-use digital marketing and communication tools.
Key services
Digital marketing tools, Communication tools, Marketing automation, Email marketing, Webinar hosting, Analytics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.4, Bootstrap 4.3.1, Popper.js, Font Awesome 6, Matomo Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Pipedrive LeadBooster chatbot, Stripe payment integration
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Use of Matomo for privacy-respecting analytics
  • Payment processing via Stripe

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Matomo
Marketing tools
LianaCloud marketing tools, Pipedrive LeadBooster chatbot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS and modern web technologies.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed categories and user control.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  4. Multiple reputable third-party integrations for analytics, payment, and chatbot.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  6. No security or incident response policies published on the main page.
  7. Website content is in Finnish and targets marketing and communication professionals.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including jQuery 3.6.4, Bootstrap 4.3.1, Popper.js, and Font Awesome 6 for UI components and icons. Analytics are handled via Matomo and Google Tag Manager, supporting privacy compliance. Payment processing is securely managed through Stripe. The site is mobile-optimized and uses a custom CMS backend as indicated by AJAX endpoints. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and deferred loading strategies. The presence of cookie consent and GDPR-compliant mechanisms indicates a mature approach to privacy. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and accessibility compliance to reduce technical debt and enhance user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with liana.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review liana.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.