Skip to main content

Security report for lexr.com

LEXR AG · Technology · Switzerland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LEXR AG is a specialized law firm serving tech, fintech, and digital companies primarily in Switzerland and Germany, with offices in Berlin, Zurich, St.Gallen, and Lausanne. The firm offers comprehensive legal services including corporate law, M&A, financing rounds, employee participation plans, and contracts tailored for startups, investors, and tech companies. Their business model emphasizes transparent, flat-fee pricing and subscription services, positioning them as a trusted partner for over 1,000 tech clients. The website demonstrates a strong market presence with professional branding, client testimonials, and a broad partner ecosystem. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including jQuery, HubSpot forms, Calendly scheduling, and various analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Borlabs Cookie for consent management. The site is well-optimized for SEO, mobile responsive, and fast loading, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, implements multiple security headers, and uses secure third-party integrations. However, there is no publicly available security policy or incident response contact information, and the WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, which slightly reduces trustworthiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, LEXR presents a professional, trustworthy online presence with strong business credibility and technical maturity. The main risk lies in the lack of WHOIS transparency and absence of published security policies, which should be addressed to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lexr.com

This scan found 21 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LEXR AG occupies a niche market as a law firm dedicated to technology and digital sectors, serving startups, scaleups, investors, and fintech companies. Their competitive advantage lies in specialized legal expertise combined with transparent pricing models and a client-centric approach. The firm leverages partnerships with numerous tech companies and maintains a strong presence in Swiss and German markets. Revenue streams likely include flat fees, subscriptions, and bespoke legal services. The target customers are tech entrepreneurs, venture capitalists, and digital businesses requiring legal support throughout their lifecycle. Growth indicators include multiple office locations, extensive client testimonials, and active marketing efforts. The partnership ecosystem is broad, involving many recognized tech firms, enhancing credibility and market reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and secure integration of third-party services such as HubSpot and Calendly. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive information or vulnerable libraries. However, the absence of a publicly available security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. Compliance with GDPR is suggested by the presence of cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not publicly visible, which could be enhanced to build greater trust with clients and partners.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and improve trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance visibility of data protection officer contact details and compliance certifications to strengthen privacy posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
LEXR AG
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LEXR AG
Description
LEXR is the law firm for tech, fintech, and digital companies in Berlin, Zurich, St.Gallen and Lausanne. VC & Startup Lawyers.
Key services
corporate law, M&A, financing rounds, employee participation plans, contracts, legal advice for startups and investors
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, HubSpot forms, Calendly widget, BxSlider, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Borlabs Cookie, Eventbrite API
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with HubSpot and Calendly

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, eTracker
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, eTracker
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Borlabs Cookie, Calendly
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Strong focus on legal services for tech and digital companies.
  3. Multiple offices in Switzerland and Germany indicated.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and marketing tools.
  5. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed.
  6. No explicit or adult content detected.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a robust WordPress CMS platform with a modern and well-maintained technology stack including jQuery, HubSpot forms, Calendly scheduling, and multiple analytics tools. Performance is optimized with lazy loading images, preloaded fonts, and asynchronous script loading. SEO is enhanced through Yoast SEO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format. Mobile optimization and accessibility are well addressed. The site uses multiple external integrations for marketing, analytics, and user engagement, which are properly configured. Technical risks are minimal but include dependency on third-party scripts and the need for continuous monitoring of plugin security and updates.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lexr.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lexr.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.