Skip to main content

Security report for letsjelly.com

Good Enough LLC · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LetsJelly.com is a SaaS platform offering a simple, affordable shared inbox solution designed for small teams to collaborate on email communications effectively. The business is positioned as a cost-effective alternative to complex help desk software, targeting small teams that require transparent and coordinated email management. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation, rich content including detailed feature descriptions and customer testimonials, and strong branding consistency. Technically, the site leverages modern web technologies such as Ruby on Rails, Turbo, Stimulus, and integrates analytics tools like Plausible, Google Tag Manager, and LinkedIn Insight. The site is mobile-optimized and performs well with good SEO and accessibility practices. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, CSRF protection, and domain registration protections, though DNSSEC is not enabled and no explicit cookie consent mechanism is present. Privacy and security policies are clearly published, supporting GDPR compliance. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and professional image consistent with a startup launched in 2024.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching letsjelly.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company behind LetsJelly.com is Good Enough LLC, a small technology business founded in 2024. The business model is subscription-based SaaS with a flat monthly fee for unlimited users, appealing to small teams seeking budget-friendly email collaboration tools. The platform offers key services including shared inbox management, internal email comments with mentions, email assignment, activity tracking, saved replies, and integrations with Slack and Discord. The market positioning emphasizes simplicity, affordability, and transparency, differentiating from more complex and expensive help desk solutions. Customer testimonials highlight ease of use and improved team coordination. The company maintains a clear online presence with comprehensive policies and a focus on user privacy. No direct contact emails or phone numbers are publicly listed, but a contact form is available. The domain registration is transparent and consistent with the business age, enhancing credibility.

Security posture

LetsJelly.com demonstrates a mature security posture for a startup. The website enforces HTTPS, includes CSRF tokens, and supports two-factor authentication. Features like spam detection and contact blocking enhance security for users. The domain is registered without privacy protection but includes clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited statuses to prevent unauthorized changes. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a minor security gap. No public incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is found, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. The site uses modern, well-maintained libraries and frameworks, reducing the risk of vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from additional transparency and DNS security enhancements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement a clear cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and enhance user trust.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Provide public incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Continue monitoring and updating third-party libraries to avoid vulnerabilities and maintain security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Good Enough LLC
Description
Get your team in sync with Jelly, a simple and affordable shared inbox for small teams. From the good people at Good Enough.
Key services
Shared inbox management, Internal email comments and mentions, Email assignment, Activity tracking, Saved replies, Team notifications, Integrations with Slack and Discord
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Ruby on Rails, Turbo Rails, Stimulus, Trix editor, ActionText, Plausible Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, DOMPurify
Frameworks
Ruby on Rails
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF tokens present
  • Two-factor authentication supported
  • Spam detection
  • Block contacts feature

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics, Google Analytics (via GTM), LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, Plausible Analytics
Marketing tools
Plausible Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a modern SaaS product for shared team email inboxes
  2. Content is rich with detailed features and customer testimonials
  3. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on main site
  4. Strong use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  5. Security policies and privacy policies are clearly linked and accessible
  6. No signs of adult or questionable content
  7. Domain is very new but consistent with startup business
  8. No WAF or blocking detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern Ruby on Rails stack with Turbo and Stimulus for enhanced interactivity and performance. It uses Trix editor and ActionText for rich text content. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and includes accessibility features. Analytics are implemented via Plausible, Google Tag Manager, and LinkedIn Insight, supporting moderate user tracking with privacy considerations. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified but DNS is managed via dnsimple.com. Performance is fast with efficient asset loading and minimal blocking scripts. The site structure and metadata are well-formed, supporting SEO and social media sharing. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom-built solution. Overall, the technical implementation is robust and modern, suitable for a SaaS startup.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with letsjelly.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review letsjelly.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.