Skip to main content

Security report for legalmail.it

InfoCert · Technology · Italy

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

InfoCert, a part of the Tinexta group, operates the website legalmail.infocert.it, offering certified email (PEC) services primarily targeting Italian businesses and individuals. The website presents a professional image with consistent branding and a clear focus on digital trust and certified communication solutions. The technical infrastructure leverages modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and several marketing and chat tools, indicating a mature digital presence. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and some privacy-conscious defaults in analytics consent, though explicit privacy and cookie policies are not detected in the provided content. The domain registration data aligns well with the business identity, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the website is well-positioned in its market niche but would benefit from enhanced transparency in privacy and security policies.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of legalmail.it. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching legalmail.it

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention legalmail.it, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
35,822
Employees
436
Customers
1,216
Third parties
34,170
Weak passwords
4%

Latest record dated 2026-06-18 · 42 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for legalmail.it.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –sendm.cert.legalmail.it2026-06-18
  • –sendm.cert.legalmail.it2026-06-16
  • –mbox.cert.legalmail.it2026-06-16
  • –mbox.cert.legalmail.it2026-06-15
  • –imapmbox.cert.legalmail.it2026-06-14

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

InfoCert holds a strong market position in Italy as a leading provider of certified email and digital trust services. The business model focuses on subscription-based email solutions compliant with Italian legal requirements. The target audience includes businesses and professionals requiring legally recognized electronic communications. The company benefits from its parent company Tinexta's backing, enhancing credibility and market reach. The website integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools to support customer acquisition and engagement. However, the absence of visible contact details and policy documents in the analyzed content suggests areas for improvement in customer support and compliance transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS and strict referrer policies. Consent for analytics and advertising storage is denied by default, reflecting privacy awareness. However, the lack of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in comprehensive security governance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Security headers beyond referrer policy are not evident, and no security.txt file is present. Enhancing these areas would improve the site's security maturity and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish clear and accessible privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  2. Implement a cookie consent banner/mechanism to manage user consent actively.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Provide explicit incident response and abuse contact information on the website.
  5. Consider publishing a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
InfoCert
Description
Con la PEC di Tinexta Infocert hai una casella di posta completa e personalizzabile. Scopri la soluzione adatta alle tue esigenze e provala gratis per 6 mesi.
Key services
Certified Email (PEC), Digital Trust Services, Email Solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, GetResponse Analytics, Vivocha Chat, BrainAIHub, Swiper.js, Material Icons, Custom JavaScript for font and color management
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Strict referrer policy
  • Consent management script for analytics and ads storage set to denied by default

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, GetResponse Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
GetResponse Analytics, Vivocha Chat
Marketing tools
GetResponse Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional service portal for certified email (PEC) by InfoCert, part of Tinexta group.
  2. Content is in Italian and targets business and individual users in Italy.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  4. Multiple analytics and marketing scripts are used with default consent set to denied.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  6. Strong branding consistency with Tinexta Infocert logos and naming.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No visible forms or contact forms in the provided HTML snippet.
  9. Good use of structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and organization information.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries and fonts for a polished user experience. It integrates Google Tag Manager and multiple analytics services, indicating a data-driven approach to marketing. The site uses custom scripts for font replacement and color management, showing attention to branding detail. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO is supported by structured data and meta tags. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. No hosting provider details were extracted, but the domain and content suggest a professional hosting environment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 79/100Low25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with legalmail.it. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review legalmail.it.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.