Skip to main content

Security report for ledger.com

Ledger · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ledger is a leading technology company specializing in cryptocurrency security solutions, primarily through hardware wallets and associated software services. Their market position is strong within the crypto asset protection sector, offering products such as Ledger Nano X, Nano S Plus, Ledger Stax, and Ledger Flex, alongside software like Ledger Live and services including Ledger Recover and a crypto payment card. The company targets cryptocurrency users, DeFi participants, and Web3 enthusiasts, providing secure and user-friendly solutions to safeguard digital assets. Technically, Ledger's website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with integrations of advanced analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager and Optimizely. The site demonstrates excellent performance, mobile optimization, and SEO practices, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement, comprehensive security headers, and published security policies, indicating a robust security posture. The security evaluation reveals strong adherence to best practices, including ISO 27001 certification and incident response readiness. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is well-managed with clear privacy and cookie policies and active consent mechanisms, aligning with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of WHOIS data for the domain is unusual and warrants further verification, though the overall trust indicators and branding consistency support the legitimacy of the site. Overall, Ledger presents a professional, secure, and trustworthy online presence with a strong focus on protecting cryptocurrency assets. Strategic recommendations include publishing a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures and enhancing transparency around data retention policies to further strengthen privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ledger.com

This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
100
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ledger operates in the technology and finance sectors, focusing on cryptocurrency security hardware and software. Their business model revolves around selling hardware wallets and providing complementary software and backup services. The company enjoys a leading market position with a broad product portfolio and a strong brand presence. Revenue streams likely include direct product sales, subscription or service fees for backup and recovery solutions, and partnerships. Target customers are individual crypto holders, institutional investors, and DeFi users. Growth indicators include new product launches and expanded service offerings. The partnership ecosystem includes e-commerce platforms and social media channels for marketing and customer engagement. Operationally, Ledger maintains a professional and secure digital footprint, supporting its market reputation.

Security posture

Ledger demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced site-wide, comprehensive security headers, and published security and incident response policies. The company holds ISO 27001 certification, indicating adherence to international information security standards. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the website content. Privacy compliance is robust, with cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR-aligned policies. Incident response contact channels are clearly provided. The main security gap is the absence of a security.txt file, which is recommended for vulnerability disclosure transparency. Overall, Ledger's security culture appears strong, supporting its role as a trusted custodian of cryptocurrency assets.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  2. Enhance transparency by detailing data retention policies in privacy documentation.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Maintain and promote incident response readiness and communication channels.
  5. Continue investing in user education to prevent phishing and social engineering attacks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ledger
Description
Secure your crypto assets such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, Monero, and more. Give yourself peace of mind by knowing that your cryptocurrencies are safe
Key services
Hardware wallets (Ledger Nano X, Nano S Plus, Ledger Stax, Ledger Flex), Ledger Live software, Ledger Recover backup service, Crypto payment card
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Optimizely, Google Tag Manager, Swiper.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Security and incident response policies published

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Optimizely
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Optimizely
Marketing tools
Optimizely
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Strong focus on cryptocurrency security and hardware wallets.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. No signs of phishing or malware detected in content.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, which is uncommon for a major commercial domain.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  7. Social media presence is consistent with brand identity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with modern front-end technologies including jQuery, Swiper.js, and integrations with Optimizely and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing optimization. The site is well-optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, with good SEO practices implemented via Yoast SEO. The technical infrastructure supports a secure and user-friendly experience, though hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The use of CDN services for static assets enhances loading speed and reliability. Technical risks are minimal, with no visible outdated or vulnerable components. Opportunities exist to further modernize by adopting security.txt and enhancing data privacy transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 79/100Low23 findingsView report
  2. 75/100Medium3 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ledger.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ledger.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.