Skip to main content

Security report for learnupon.com

LearnUpon · Education · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LearnUpon is a medium-sized company founded in 2012 specializing in providing a powerful Learning Management System (LMS) platform designed to deliver engaging learning experiences that enhance performance, retention, and business growth. The company targets businesses and organizations seeking online training solutions, positioning itself as an established player in the education technology sector. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with excellent content quality and user experience. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and leverages modern tools such as Google Tag Manager and OneTrust for consent management, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is well-optimized for SEO, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, with fast performance and comprehensive metadata including structured data for enhanced search visibility. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, implements key security headers, and uses consent mechanisms for cookies, reflecting good security hygiene. However, there is no explicit security policy or incident response information publicly available, which could be improved to enhance transparency and trust. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable anomaly but does not detract significantly from the overall legitimacy given the professional presentation and contact information. Overall, LearnUpon presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility and technical maturity. Strategic recommendations include publishing a dedicated security policy, incident response contacts, and a vulnerability disclosure policy to further strengthen security posture and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching learnupon.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LearnUpon operates in the education technology sector, offering a SaaS LMS platform primarily to corporate clients. Its business model focuses on B2B subscription services that enable organizations to manage and deliver online training effectively. The company has a solid market position supported by a professional online presence and active social media channels. Revenue streams likely include licensing fees and service subscriptions. The target customer segments are businesses seeking scalable and engaging learning solutions. Growth indicators include a well-maintained website with comprehensive content and integration of modern marketing and analytics tools. The partnership ecosystem includes major social media platforms and consent management providers, although no direct partner or subsidiary domains were identified. The company demonstrates strategic digital marketing and compliance awareness, positioning it well for continued expansion.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, which protect against common web vulnerabilities. The use of OneTrust indicates compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of a publicly available security policy and incident response contact information suggests room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file, which are best practices for mature security postures. Overall, the security posture is strong but could be enhanced by formalizing and publishing security governance documents and response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive security policy page detailing security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information, such as a dedicated security or abuse email.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency by including data retention policies and detailed privacy compliance documentation.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LearnUpon
Description
Power engaging learning experiences, boost retention and fuel business growth with LearnUpon, a powerful LMS platform.
Key services
Learning Management System platform, Online training software
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Consent Management, Yoast SEO
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • Consent management for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
OneTrust Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong SEO and structured data implementation.
  3. Clear business contact information and social media presence.
  4. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  5. No WHOIS data available, which is a concern but not definitive of illegitimacy.
  6. Good privacy and cookie compliance with consent mechanisms.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response info found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing modern web technologies and frameworks. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and OneTrust for cookie consent management, reflecting a mature approach to data privacy and marketing. The site uses optimized fonts and responsive design techniques to ensure excellent mobile performance and accessibility. SEO is well addressed through meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Performance appears fast with lazy loading and optimized assets. There is no indication of technical debt or outdated components in the provided HTML. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence with opportunities to enhance security documentation and incident handling capabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100Medium25 findingsView report
  2. 75/100Medium21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with learnupon.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review learnupon.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.