Skip to main content

Security report for leapwise.solutions

Leapwise · Technology · Croatia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

31/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Leapwise is a medium-sized software development company based in Croatia, specializing in custom software solutions, system integration, and dedicated development teams primarily targeting enterprise clients in technology, telecommunications, cybersecurity, and IoT sectors. The company positions itself as a trusted partner delivering scalable, modular, and maintainable software with a strong emphasis on quality and long-term client success. The website reflects a high level of professionalism with rich content, client testimonials, and industry certifications, supporting its market credibility. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins for SEO, caching, and analytics. However, the absence of a valid SSL/TLS certificate and HTTPS support is a significant security shortfall, exposing users to potential risks and undermining trust. Performance metrics are not available, but the use of caching and lazy loading suggests some optimization efforts. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with good SEO practices. Security posture is weak due to lack of HTTPS and minimal security headers. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, which could be a concern for enterprise clients. Privacy compliance is supported by a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism, indicating awareness of GDPR requirements. Contact information is available primarily via forms and a physical address, but no direct company emails or phone numbers are listed. Overall, Leapwise demonstrates strong business credibility and digital maturity but must urgently address its SSL/TLS implementation to improve security and trustworthiness. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS, enhancing security headers, and publishing security policies to align with enterprise client expectations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching leapwise.solutions

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
18
Average
31

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Leapwise operates in a competitive software development market with a focus on enterprise-grade solutions. Their business model centers on B2B engagements offering product development, custom software, system integration, and team augmentation. The company leverages certifications and memberships to build trust and attract clients. Their target customers are enterprises in telecom, cybersecurity, and IoT domains, indicating a niche specialization. The website content and testimonials suggest a strong partnership ecosystem and a reputation for professionalism and technical excellence. Growth indicators include active content marketing via blogs, webinars, and insights. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers may indicate a preference for controlled lead generation through forms.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low due to the absence of HTTPS and SSL/TLS certificates, which is a critical vulnerability. The website lacks advanced security headers and mechanisms like HSTS, OCSP stapling, and session resumption. No vulnerabilities such as Heartbleed or POODLE were detected, but the lack of encryption exposes data in transit to interception. There is no public incident response or security policy, which may impact client confidence. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with cookie consent and a privacy policy, but the absence of a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency. Overall, the security posture requires immediate improvement to meet enterprise standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce HTTPS site-wide to secure data transmission.
  2. Add and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy for enhanced protection.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to clients and users.
  4. Enable OCSP stapling and TLS session resumption to improve SSL performance and security.
  5. Regularly audit and update all software components and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including nginx server, PHP, and caching via W3 Total Cache. SEO is enhanced using Rank Math PRO, and analytics are handled by Plausible Analytics and Google Tag Manager. The site uses lazy loading for images and is mobile-optimized with responsive design. However, the lack of HTTPS significantly undermines the technical robustness. Performance data is missing, but caching and CDN headers suggest some optimization. The site integrates multiple external scripts for analytics and marketing, which are well managed with consent mechanisms. Technical risks include potential data interception due to missing encryption and limited security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with leapwise.solutions. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review leapwise.solutions.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.