Skip to main content

Security report for leadpipe.com

Leadpipe · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Leadpipe is a UK-based technology company specializing in website visitor identification software that enables businesses to capture detailed visitor information such as names, emails, phone numbers, and LinkedIn profiles without requiring form submissions. Positioned as a cost-effective and high-conversion alternative to traditional paid ads and databases, Leadpipe targets SaaS startups, retailers, agencies, and VC-backed founders. The company offers real-time visitor notifications, email validation, and buyer journey analytics, integrating with popular marketing tools and communication platforms. The website demonstrates a high level of digital maturity with modern technologies, fast performance, and excellent mobile optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and security headers, though dedicated security policies and incident response information are not publicly available. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and GDPR adherence. Overall, Leadpipe presents a professional and trustworthy online presence with strong business credibility and technical implementation.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of leadpipe.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching leadpipe.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
59
Security headers
60
Email security
55
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Leadpipe operates in the technology sector with a SaaS business model focused on lead generation and marketing automation. Its market positioning emphasizes scalability, predictability, and cost efficiency compared to paid advertising. The company leverages partnerships such as Promotekit for affiliate marketing and integrates with multiple analytics and tracking platforms to optimize customer acquisition. The target audience includes both B2B and B2C businesses seeking to enhance their first-party data strategies. Trust indicators include positive customer reviews, industry badges, and case studies. The company maintains a UK-based legal entity, MIDBOUND LIMITED, with a physical address in London. The website content and technical infrastructure reflect a modern, growth-oriented company with a focus on data-driven marketing solutions.

Security posture

Leadpipe exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced site-wide, use of multiple security headers, and no visible exposure of sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. The site employs deferred and asynchronous loading of scripts to optimize performance and security. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. The extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts necessitates ongoing vigilance to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security measures in place are robust for a SaaS marketing platform, but formalizing security governance and incident response would enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance form security with CAPTCHA or bot detection to prevent abuse and spam.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
MIDBOUND LIMITED
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Leadpipe
Description
Leadpipe provides website visitor identification software that captures over 35% of website visitors by name, email, phone number, and LinkedIn data, enabling businesses to convert visitors into leads and revenue.
Key services
Website visitor identification, Real-time visitor notifications, Email validation, Buyer journey analytics, Integration with email marketing and Slack
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Tag Manager, Segment Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel, Wistia Video Player, jQuery, Cal.com scheduling, Simple Analytics, Plausible Analytics, Sentry (error tracking), Promotekit
Frameworks
Webflow CMS
Platforms
Google Cloud, Cloudflare
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of deferred and async scripts
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Segment Analytics, Plausible Analytics, Simple Analytics, Swetrix
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Segment Analytics, Plausible Analytics, Simple Analytics, Swetrix
Marketing tools
Segment Analytics, Cal.com
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website offers advanced visitor identification software targeting B2B and B2C businesses.
  2. Strong emphasis on first-party data and real-time lead generation.
  3. Multiple integrations and marketing tools used for analytics and tracking.
  4. Clear calls to action with free trial and demo scheduling.
  5. No direct company emails or phone numbers found on the main page; contact primarily via forms.
  6. Social media presence on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and hosting infrastructure.
  8. Good privacy and cookie policy presence with GDPR compliance.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS and hosted via Cloudflare and Google Cloud, ensuring fast and reliable delivery. It integrates a comprehensive set of modern technologies including Segment Analytics, Plausible, Simple Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Wistia for video, and Cal.com for scheduling. The site is optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with proper meta tags and SEO practices implemented. Performance is fast with asynchronous and deferred script loading. The technical stack supports scalable marketing and analytics operations, though reliance on multiple third-party services requires continuous monitoring for security and privacy compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern, well-implemented, and aligned with the business goals of lead generation and visitor identification.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 70/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with leadpipe.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review leadpipe.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.