Skip to main content

Security report for leado.pl

PERSKIMEDIA Szymon Perski · Technology · Poland

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Leado.pl operates as a small-scale technology service providing a URL shortening platform primarily targeting general internet users. The website offers a straightforward interface for shortening long URLs, with minimal additional content or features. The business appears to be locally operated in Poland, founded in 2018, and registered under PERSKIMEDIA Szymon Perski. The market position is likely niche with limited competitive differentiation based on available data. From a technical perspective, the website employs basic web technologies including HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, with external font resources loaded from Google Fonts. The site includes a CSRF token in its form, indicating some security consideration. However, the absence of security headers, DNSSEC, and advanced security configurations suggests room for improvement in technical maturity. Performance and mobile optimization are basic but functional. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking in security headers and DNSSEC. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no contact or incident response information is provided, which limits compliance with GDPR and general best practices. The WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the business, supporting legitimacy. No adult or questionable content is present, making the site safe for general audiences. Overall, the site scores moderately on AI evaluation, with strengths in business legitimacy and basic security practices but weaknesses in privacy compliance and comprehensive security measures. Strategic improvements in policy transparency, security headers, and contact information would enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching leado.pl

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Leado.pl is positioned as a small technology service focused on URL shortening, a common utility in digital communications. The business model centers on providing a free or possibly monetized link shortening service, though no monetization or advertising is evident. The target customers are general internet users needing link shortening. The company is registered in Poland and has been operational since 2018, indicating some stability. There is no evidence of partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent companies. The lack of contact information and policies suggests a lean operation with limited customer engagement or formal business processes. Competitive advantages or growth indicators are not discernible from the data.

Security posture

The security maturity of leado.pl is basic. HTTPS is implemented, and the presence of a CSRF token in the form is a positive security control. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and explicit security or privacy policies indicates gaps in defense-in-depth and compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are visible, which could hinder timely handling of security events. The site does not appear to use analytics or tracking technologies, reducing privacy risks but also limiting insight into user behavior. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a low-risk utility service but should be enhanced to meet modern standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  4. Add contact information including email and phone to improve business credibility and support.
  5. Establish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure process to enhance security readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PERSKIMEDIA Szymon Perski
Description
Website provides a URL shortening service allowing users to shorten long links.
Key services
URL shortening
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • CSRF token implemented in form

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a simple URL shortening service with minimal content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses provided.
  4. CSRF token present in form indicating some security awareness.
  5. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  6. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  7. No social media or external business contact links found.
  8. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the business.
  9. Website content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technology stack with HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, loading fonts from Google Fonts. There is no evidence of a CMS or advanced frameworks. The site includes a CSRF token in its form, indicating some security awareness. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimizations detected. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but functional. SEO is minimal with only basic meta tags. No analytics or advertising scripts are present, reducing complexity but also limiting marketing insights. Hosting provider details are not available from the data. Overall, the technical implementation is straightforward but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with leado.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review leado.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.