Skip to main content

Security report for leadboxer.com

LeadBoxer · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LeadBoxer is a technology company offering a SaaS platform designed to identify anonymous B2B website visitors and qualify them using behavioral and firmographic data, providing contact details to enhance lead generation efforts. The website positions itself as a solution for businesses seeking to convert website traffic into qualified leads, targeting B2B audiences. The platform integrates multiple analytics and tracking technologies, including Google Analytics, Hotjar, Segment, and PostHog, indicating a mature digital infrastructure focused on data-driven insights. The website is built using the Framer CMS, which supports modern design and responsive features, contributing to a good user experience and mobile optimization. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. Additionally, the lack of visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, as well as missing contact information, reduces the overall business credibility and privacy compliance posture. Security best practices such as HTTPS usage are implied but not fully verifiable from the provided data, and security headers appear to be missing or not detected. Overall, while the business offering and technical implementation are solid, the website's security and compliance posture require improvement to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching leadboxer.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LeadBoxer operates in the technology sector, focusing on B2B lead generation and visitor identification services. Its business model revolves around providing a SaaS platform that aggregates behavioral and firmographic data to qualify leads and provide actionable contact information. The company targets businesses that rely on website traffic for sales and marketing conversion. The use of advanced analytics tools suggests a data-centric approach to product development and customer insights. The absence of detailed company registration or contact information on the website limits the ability to assess market positioning fully or identify partnerships and subsidiaries. The platform's integration with multiple tracking and analytics services indicates a comprehensive marketing ecosystem, although transparency regarding data protection and privacy policies is lacking.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS usage and asynchronous loading of analytics scripts, which helps performance and security. However, the lack of detected security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security is a notable gap. No explicit privacy or security policies are found, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The absence of WHOIS data and registrant information further complicates trust assessment. The extensive use of third-party tracking services increases the attack surface and privacy risks if not properly managed. Overall, the security maturity appears basic, with room for significant improvements in transparency, policy publication, and technical security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies clearly accessible on the website to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear and verifiable contact information including company emails, phone numbers, and physical addresses to improve business credibility.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to ensure domain legitimacy and reduce suspicion.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to demonstrate commitment to security and responsible disclosure.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LeadBoxer
Description
Identify anonymous B2B website visitors, qualify them with behavior and firmographic data, get contact details — all in one platform.
Key services
Anonymous B2B website visitor identification, Lead qualification using behavior and firmographic data, Contact detail retrieval
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Hotjar, Segment Analytics, PostHog
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URL)
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and analytics scripts loaded asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Segment, PostHog
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Segment, PostHog
Marketing tools
Segment Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces trust.
  3. Website uses modern analytics and tracking tools extensively.
  4. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML content.
  5. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the content.
  6. Website content is focused on B2B lead identification and qualification services.
  7. Technical implementation uses Framer CMS and multiple third-party analytics scripts.
  8. Security headers and explicit security policies are not detected in the provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Framer CMS platform, leveraging modern web fonts and a variety of asynchronous JavaScript analytics and tracking libraries including Google Analytics, Hotjar, Segment, and PostHog. The use of Google Tag Manager indicates a flexible approach to managing marketing tags. The site appears to be mobile optimized with good design quality and navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple third-party scripts. No explicit hosting provider information is available. The absence of detected security headers and privacy policies suggests technical debt in security and compliance areas. The website would benefit from performance optimization and enhanced accessibility features to improve overall technical maturity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with leadboxer.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review leadboxer.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.